<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Who We Are</title>
      <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/</link>
      <description>Who We Are: A weekly column about Australia, by David Dale.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:19:40 +0900</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>The Who We Are update: Week 24</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>The ratings race, updated 10 am Sunday</b>
Channel Seven won the week, largely because of <em>Australia's Got Talent</em> and its news. If this column's theory of <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/06/tribalrudd.html">a political link</a> is correct, Kevin Rudd can look forward to a slight blip in the polls. SBS has stolen viewers from the ABC, thanks to the soccer.

The prime time audience shares for the week ended up like this: ABC3 0.4%; SBSTWO 0.4%; ONE 1.0; ABC2 1.2; 7TWO 2.5; GO 2.8; SBS1 4.8; ABC1 11.8; All Pay Stations 14.8; Ten 17.9; Nine 19.5; Seven 20.3.

<b>What Australia watched, week ending June 12</b>
<img alt="youngdannii.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/youngdannii.jpg" width="171" height="264" /> Description	Total	Sydney	Melbourne	Brisbane	Adelaide	Perth
1	MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA - CHALLENGE	Ten	1,894,000	586,000	611,000	301,000	212,000	184,000
2	AUSTRALIA'S GOT TALENT	Seven	1,831,000	552,000	599,000	282,000	201,000	197,000
3	MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA	Ten	1,809,000	495,000	590,000	307,000	192,000	225,000
4	SEVEN NEWS - SUN	Seven	1,696,000	488,000	507,000	354,000	145,000	202,000
5	UNDERBELLY: THE GOLDEN MILE	Nine	1,599,000	546,000	506,000	253,000	155,000	139,000
6	SEVEN NEWS - SAT	Seven	1,562,000	409,000	477,000	337,000	134,000	205,000
7	MODERN FAMILY	Ten	1,536,000	373,000	530,000	276,000	141,000	216,000
8	NCIS	Ten	1,513,000	360,000	434,000	339,000	166,000	214,000
9	NINE NEWS SUNDAY	Nine	1,505,000	439,000	404,000	337,000	192,000	133,000
10	SEVEN NEWS	Seven	1,501,000	402,000	407,000	303,000	170,000	219,000
11	TODAY TONIGHT	Seven	1,465,000	373,000	406,000	302,000	171,000	213,000
12	GLEE	Ten	1,413,000	401,000	425,000	274,000	137,000	176,000
13	SUNDAY NIGHT	Seven	1,393,000	389,000	424,000	305,000	139,000	135,000
14	BONES	Seven	1,327,000	362,000	391,000	264,000	150,000	159,000
Continued <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/06/the_who_we_are_81.html">here</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/06/the_who_we_are_81.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/06/the_who_we_are_81.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:19:40 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Tribal Mind: The films Australia loved</title>
         <description><![CDATA[FOR THE LATEST UPDATE OF THIS CHART, AND A FORUM TO DISCUSS IT, GO TO <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blog/the-tribal-mind">The Tribal Mind</a>.

 List of the 150 highest-grossing movies of all time, and the 65 movies seen by the greatest number of Australians, prepared by David Dale for <em>The Sydney Morning Herald</em> from data provided by the Motion Picture Distributors Association of Australia. Last updated June 10, 2010.

<b>Top flicks of the past 12 months:</b> Avatar $115 million; Alice in Wonderland $37.5 m; Sherlock Holmes $26m; Iron Man 2 $26m; Sex and the City 2 $23m; Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakuel $23m; How To Train Your Dragon $20.5m; Clash of the Titans $19.5m; Shrek Forever After 19m; Robin Hood $18.5m; It's Complicated $16m; Valentine's Day $16m; The Blind Side $13.2m; Prince of Persia $11m; Tooth Fairy $10.5m; Shutter Island $10m; Date Night $9m. Hangovers from last year: Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince $40.6m; Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen $40.3m; New Moon $39m; Ice Age 3: Dawn of the Dinosaurs $29.8m; Up $28m; The Hangover $21.4m.
<strong>Australian films in the past 12 months:</strong> Mao's Last Dancer $15.2m; Bran Nue Day $7.5m; The Kings of Mykonos $5m; Animal Kingdom $4m; Charlie and Boots $3.7m; Samson and Delilah $3.2m; Beneath Hill 60 $3.1m; Bright Star $2.9m; Daybreakers $2.4m (worldwide $35m); I Love You Too $2.4m; Animal Kingdom $2m. 

Australia's total box office for 2009 was $1.09 billion -- 15 per cent more than the record figure in 2008. But the number of admissions was 90.7 million, less than the record 92.5 million in 2001 and 2002. Average ticket price in 2009 was $12. Australian films got 5 per cent of the box office. 

<strong>The Australian box office</strong>
 <img alt="joker.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/joker.jpg" width="199" height="217" /> 1. Avatar (2009) $115m
2. Titanic (1997) $57.6 million
3. Shrek 2 (2004) $50.4m
4. The Return of the King (2003) $49.4m
5. Crocodile Dundee (1986) $47.7m
6. Fellowship of the Ring (2001) $47.4m
7. The Dark Knight (2008) $46.1m
8. The Two Towers (2002) $45.7m
9. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001) $42.3m
10. Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (2009) $40.6m
11. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009) $40.3m
12. Star Wars I: The Phantom Menace (1999) $39m
13. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006) $38 m
14. The Twilight saga: New Moon (2009) $38m
15. Finding Nemo (2003) $37.5m
16. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) $37.5m
17. Alice in Wonderland (2010) $37.5m
18. Australia (2008) $37m (US$50m, world $US205m)
19. Babe (1995) $37m]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_films_austr.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_films_austr.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Tribal Mind</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 23:50:27 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Tribal Mind: The music Australia loved</title>
         <description><![CDATA[FOR THE LATEST UPDATE OF THIS CHART, AND A FORUM TO DISCUSS IT, GO TO <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blog/the-tribal-mind">The Tribal Mind</a>

Lists of top selling albums and most successful performers, prepared by David Dale using data from ARIA and last updated May 31, 2010.

<strong>The top selling albums of the CD era</strong>
<img alt="farnham.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/farnham.jpg" width="212" height="142" /> 1. Whispering Jack (John Farnham) 1986
2. Come On Over (Shania Twain) 1997 
3. Jagged Little Pill (Alanis Morissette) 1995
4. Innocent Eyes (Delta Goodrem) 2003
5. Music Box (Mariah Carey) 1993
6. Thriller (Michael Jackson) 1983
7. Savage Garden (Savage Garden) 1997
8. Falling Into You (Celine Dion) 1996
9. Recurring Dream (Crowded House) 1996
10. Abba Gold (Abba) 1992
11. Immaculate Collection (Madonna) 1990
12. Age of Reason (John Farnham) 1988
13. The Very Best of (The Eagles) 1994
14. Don't Ask (Tina Arena) 1994 
15. Remasters (Led Zeppelin) 1990
16 I'm Not Dead (Pink) 2006
17 Funhouse (Pink) 2009
18. Soul Deep (Jimmy Barnes) 1991
19. Forgiven Not Forgotten (The Corrs) 1995
20. Come Away With Me (Norah Jones) 2002
21. The Sound of White (Missy Higgins) 2005
22 Yourself or Someone Like You (Matchbox 20) 1996
23 Forrest Gump (Soundtrack) 1994
24 Only By The Night (Kings of Leon) 2008
25 Get Born (Jet) 2007]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_music_austr_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_music_austr_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Tribal Mind</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 22:50:14 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Tribal Mind: The TV shows Australia loved</title>
         <description><![CDATA[FOR THE LATEST UPDATE OF THIS CHART, AND A FORUM TO DISCUSS IT, GO TO <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blog/the-tribal-mind">The Tribal Mind</a>

This contains charts of the most watched programs of the 20th and 21st centuries, prepared by David Dale for <em>The Sydney Morning Herald</em> and based on data from OzTAM and ACNielsen. Last updated May 31, 2010.

<b>Most watched shows in 2010:</b> State of Origin rugby league match 1 (9) 2.46m; Tennis: Aus Open Men's Final (7) 2.35m; <em>Underbelly: The Golden Mile</em> premiere (9) 2.24m; <em>MasterChef Australia</em> (10) 1.93m; <em>Top Gear</em> premiere (9) 1.68m; <em>Two and a Half Men</em> (9) 1.59m; The Biggest Loser Winner Announced (10) 1.57m; <em>My Kitchen Rules</em> (7) 1.56m.

<strong>The top shows since 2001</strong>
Based on OzTAM's audience estimates for the mainland capitals. Series figures are for the most watched episode of the year.
<img alt="julie.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/julie.jpg" width="267" height="172" /> 1 Tennis: Aus Open final - Hewitt v Safin 2005 (7) 4.04 million
2 Rugby World Cup final 2003 (7) 4.01 million
3 <em>MasterChef Australia</em> - Winner Announced 2009 (10) 3.74 million
4 Commonwealth Games Opening Ceremony 2006 (9) 3.56m
5 AFL Grand Final 2005 (10) 3.39m
6 <em>Australian Idol</em> final verdict 2004 (10) 3.35m
7 <em>Australian Idol</em> final 2003 (10) 3.30 m
8 AFL Grand Final 2006 (10) 3.15m
9 <em>The Block</em> auction 2003 (9) 3.11 m
10 September 11 reportage, September 12, 2001 (9, 7, ABC) 3.10 m
11 Tennis: Wimbledon day 14 2001 (9) 3.04 m
12 AFL grand final 2003 (10) 2.96 m
13 AFL grand final 2009 (10) 2.70m
14 <em>Big Brother</em> winner announced 2004 (10) 2.86m
15 <em>Australian Idol</em> Live from Opera House 2004 (10) 2.86 m
16 Beijing Olympics opening ceremony 2008 (7) 2.82m]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_tv_shows_au.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_tv_shows_au.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Tribal Mind</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 21:50:58 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Tribal Mind: The DVDs Australia loved</title>
         <description><![CDATA[FOR THE LATEST UPDATE OF THIS CHART, AND A FORUM TO DISCUSS IT, GO TO <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blog/the-tribal-mind">The Tribal Mind</a>

List of the most most purchased DVDs since 1998, prepared by David Dale for <em>The Sydney Morning Herald</em>, using data from GFK Australia. Last updated May 31, 2010.

<strong>The top selling DVDs of all time</strong>
<img alt="th_findingnemo.jpg" src="http://blogs.smh.com.au/sit/th_findingnemo.jpg" width="135" height="113" /> 1. Finding Nemo (2004)
2 Mamma Mia! (2008)
3 Monsters Inc (2002)
4 Fellowship of the Ring (2002)
5 The Two Towers (2003)
6 Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2003)
7 Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2006)
8 Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)
9 Return of the King (2004)
10 Avatar (2010)
11 Pirates of the Caribbean (2004)
12 The Notebook (2005)
13 Shrek 2 (2004)
14 Dirty Dancing (2000)
15 The Dark Knight (2008)
16 Pirates 2: Dead Man's Chest (2006)
17 Cars (2006)
18 The Matrix (1999)
19 The Incredibles (2005)
20 Ice Age (2002)
21 Gladiator (2000)
22 Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007)]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_dvds_austra.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_dvds_austra.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Tribal Mind</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 20:10:09 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Who We Are update: Week 23</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Australia's smartest forum about popular culture has moved to <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blog/the-tribal-mind">The Tribal Mind</a>

<b>The ratings race, updated 10 am Sunday</b>
The prime time audience shares for the week ended up like this: SBSTWO 0.3%; ABC3 0.4%;  ONE 1.1; ABC2 1.2; 7TWO 2.7; GO 2.8; SBS1 4.1; ABC1 11.3; All Pay Stations 15.2; Ten 18.2; Seven 19.4; Nine 20.7. On this trajectory, Nine will win the year. Does it deserve to? Was four years in the wilderness long enough to teach it about keeping faith with viewers?

<b>What Australia watched, week ending June 5</b>
<img alt="charlieand.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/charlieand.jpg" width="214" height="217" /> Description   Total  Sydney   Melbourne   Brisbane   Adelaide   Perth   
 1 MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA   Ten   1,881,000   511,000   621,000   311,000   200,000   238,000   
  2   MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA - CHALLENGE   Ten   1,833,000   482,000   611,000   312,000   213,000   215,000   
  3   SEVEN NEWS - SUN   Seven   1,777,000   437,000   508,000   408,000   153,000   270,000   
  4   NINE NEWS SUNDAY   Nine   1,765,000   543,000   510,000   345,000   196,000   171,000   
  5   UNDERBELLY: THE GOLDEN MILE   Nine   1,667,000   561,000   524,000   281,000   130,000   172,000   
  6   AUSTRALIA'S GOT TALENT   Seven   1,586,000   461,000   493,000   261,000   173,000   198,000   
  7   SEVEN NEWS   Seven   1,540,000   416,000   443,000   290,000   161,000   229,000   
  8   TWO AND A HALF MEN   Nine   1,536,000   441,000   502,000   296,000   122,000   175,000   
  9   MODERN FAMILY   Ten   1,524,000   448,000   493,000   244,000   170,000   170,000   
  10   SEVEN NEWS - SAT   Seven   1,484,000   430,000   492,000   298,000   101,000   163,000   
  11   NCIS   Ten   1,460,000   420,000   386,000   283,000   179,000   191,000   
  12   CUSTOMS   Nine   1,455,000   407,000   454,000   254,000   161,000   179,000   
  13   TODAY TONIGHT   Seven   1,419,000   357,000   409,000   286,000   159,000   208,000   
  14   GLEE   Ten   1,392,000   381,000   470,000   277,000   120,000   145,000   ]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_80.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_80.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 10:05:48 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Who We Are update: Week 22</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This week's forum is now a heritage item - worth studying but no longer current. For the latest on Australian attitudes and media trends, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare">blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare</a>.

To discuss whether family is the new technology, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/tribal_adhd.html">The Tribal Mind</a>.
To find the future of Australian film, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/who_we_are_film.html">Who We Are</a>.

<b>The ratings race, updated 10am Sunday</b>
<img alt="evangelinelilly.jpg" src="http://blogs.smh.com.au/entertainment/evangelinelilly.jpg" width="143" height="195" /> Channel Nine easily won the week, thanks to biffo, and looks like winning the year, largely because of <em>Underbelly 3</em>. Seven is looking old and tired. Its strongest programs are the news (unaffected by any alleged boycott) and <em>Australia's Got Talent</em>, which is propped up by viewers over 55 who don't watch <em>MasterChef</em>. If this column's theory of <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/03/te_tribal_mind_2.html">a political link</a> is correct, Tony Abbott's rise in the opinion polls will parallel Nine's rise in the ratings. Channel Seven needs to pull a rabbit out of its hat, just like Kevin Rudd.

The prime time audience shares for the week ended up like this: SBSTWO 0.3%; ABC3 0.4%;  ONE 1.1; ABC2 1.2; 7TWO 2.6; GO 2.8; SBS1 4.0; ABC1 11.9; All Pay Stations 14.8; Ten 17.6; Seven 19.3; Nine 21.8.

This was Pay TV's account of itself: "FOX Sports' 3D broadcast of the World Cup warm-up match for the Socceroos, Live: Football: Australia v NZ, topped the week with 299,000 viewers; Live: NRL Sharks v Broncos was watched by 275,000 people and Live: AFL West Coast v St Kilda was seen by 211,000 people (on FOX Sports).

"Tuesday night's broadcast of <em>Family Guy</em> on FOX8 was seen by 135,000 people, <em>Selling Houses Australia</em> on The Lifestyle Channel was watched by 120,000, and the premiere of <em>Starstruck</em> on Disney Channel was seen by 98,000 people. <em>Top Gear</em> on BBC Knowledge was watched by 91,000 people, <em>Project Runway</em> on Arena by 89,000, and <em>iCarly</em> on Nickelodeon was viewed by 76,000 people.

"In week 22, subscription TV channels had 21.2% of all metropolitan viewing between 6am and midnight, 20.0% of all regional viewing and 54.4% of all viewing in subscription TV homes."

<b>What Australia watched, week ending May 30</b>
Description	Total	Sydney	Melbourne	Brisbane	Adelaide	Perth
1	STATE OF ORIGIN RUGBY LEAGUE NSW V QLD 1ST - MATCH	Nine	2,455,000	1,179,000	328,000	824,000	62,000	62,000
2	MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA	Ten	1,677,000	424,000	614,000	237,000	179,000	222,000
3	MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA - CHALLENGE	Ten	1,674,000	459,000	552,000	278,000	181,000	204,000
4	UNDERBELLY: THE GOLDEN MILE	Nine	1,643,000	580,000	480,000	238,000	148,000	197,000
5	STATE OF ORIGIN RUGBY LEAGUE NSW V QLD 1ST - PRE MATCH	Nine	1,633,000	778,000	258,000	597,000		
6	SEVEN NEWS - SUN	Seven	1,630,000	376,000	453,000	384,000	157,000	261,000
7	NINE NEWS SUNDAY	Nine	1,563,000	456,000	509,000	253,000	189,000	155,000
8	MODERN FAMILY	Ten	1,548,000	393,000	514,000	287,000	161,000	192,000
9	SEVEN NEWS	Seven	1,539,000	409,000	446,000	291,000	161,000	232,000
10	SEVEN NEWS - SAT	Seven	1,496,000	447,000	377,000	333,000	133,000	206,000
11	NCIS	Ten	1,466,000	381,000	393,000	310,000	181,000	201,000
12	AUSTRALIA'S GOT TALENT	Seven	1,448,000	427,000	468,000	227,000	141,000	185,000
13	TODAY TONIGHT	Seven	1,445,000	368,000	412,000	282,000	169,000	215,000
14	TWO AND A HALF MEN	Nine	1,408,000	377,000	487,000	253,000	120,000	172,000
15	NINE NEWS	Nine	1,359,000	383,000	418,000	276,000	125,000	156,000
16	GLEE	Ten	1,333,000	425,000	408,000	217,000	131,000	152,000
17	CUSTOMS	Nine	1,331,000	365,000	446,000	241,000	129,000	149,000
18	TOP GEAR	Nine	1,291,000	372,000	410,000	263,000	129,000	116,000
Continued <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_79.html">here</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_79.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_79.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 09:16:02 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Tribal Mind: Who the hell needs trideo anyway?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Australia's smartest forum about popular culture has moved to <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blog/the-tribal-mind">The Tribal Mind</a>

<strong>by David Dale</strong>
IF YOU are one of the half million Australians who have paid between $18 and $35 for the DVD of <em>Avatar</em>, you may have some sympathy with a remark made by Barack Obama during his election campaign: "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change -- it's still gonna stink."

At the time, Obama's enemies pretended to believe the remark was an insult to vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin. They were being disingenuous. They knew all along that Obama was referring to the Republican Party's attempts to glamorise policies that benefitted only the rich.

Now some <em>Avatar</em>-purchasers might be tempted to extend the metaphor to the way 3-D (the lipstick) is being used to tart up big-budget movies (the pigs) which would otherwise be pretty damn ordinary, as well as some films that could succeed perfectly well without the enhancement.

<img alt="dicapwinslet.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/dicapwinslet.jpg" width="209" height="195" /> Forced to watch <em>Avatar</em> at home on a small screen in two dimensions, audiences may wonder if the technology that let cinemas charge $20 a ticket was distracting us from a derivative and predictable plot (<em>Pocahontas</em> meets <em>Dances With Wolves</em>), a flippy hippie philosophy (Gaia meets L. Ron Hubbard), and some seriously amateurish acting (Sam Worthington's trans-Pacific accent suggests that in the future, all English-speakers will sound like Sydneysiders who have spent two weeks in LA). Maybe those glasses for which we paid rental fees of between $1 and $5 were not just image-separating but also rose-coloured.

Hollywood's current obsession with 3-D as a quick-fix for declining
audiences is the subject of an essay by America's best known movie critic, Roger Ebert, published in <em>Newsweek</em> magazine. Here is Ebert's complaint about the 3-D explosion: "It adds nothing essential to the moviegoing experience. For some, it is an annoying distraction. For others, it creates nausea and headaches. It is driven largely to sell expensive projection equipment ... Its image is noticeably darker than standard 2-D. It is unsuitable for grown-up films of any seriousness. It limits the freedom of directors to make films as they choose. For moviegoers in the PG-13 and R ranges [older than 15], it only rarely provides an experience worth paying a premium for."

Ebert points out that <em>Clash of the Titans</em> and <em>Alice in Wonderland</em> were filmed in 2-D and belatedly reconstructed as fake 3-D, on the orders of panicking studios inspired by <em>Avatar</em>'s success. He wonders if the conversions were really necessary. Now consider this chart, kindly supplied by GFK Australia ...

<img alt="heathbat.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/heathbat.jpg" width="187" height="290" /> <strong>Australia's top selling DVDs so far this year:</strong>
1 Avatar
2 The Twilight Saga: New Moon
3 Up
4 2012
5 G-Force
6 Michael Jackson's This Is It
7 My Sister's Keeper
8 Julie and Julia
9 Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
10 Inglourious Basterds.

Would any of those films have been more entertaining in 3-D? Would <em>New Moon</em> have seemed less tedious if the werewolves had leapt out of the screen? Would <em>Up</em> have been more charming if the balloons had swirled around our heads? The special effects extravaganzas <em>2012</em> and <em>Transformers</em> seem to have got along fine in flat format. Apparently audiences were not deterred from collecting them for their home library by any deficiency in the dimension department.

Perhaps there was a devious strategy behind the release of <em>Avatar</em> in 2-D form. The marketers may be counting on the disappointment of viewers to drive up sales of 3-D television sets, in anticipation of the release of the 3-D bells-and-whistles version of <em>Avatar</em> at the end of the year. And from there, we'll have to repurchase our all-time favourites, made over into 3-D: <em>Titanic</em> (would the rushing water be any more scary?), <em>The Dark Knight</em> (would the truck chase be any more exciting?) and <em>Crocodile Dundee</em> (would THAT be even more of a knife?). 

Go to Comments to discuss whether 3-D adds anything more than lipstick to your moviegoing experience, and whether you see any reason to invest in yet another new home entertainment delivery system.]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/tribal_avatar.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/tribal_avatar.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Tribal Mind</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:42:46 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Who We Are update: Week 21</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This week's forum is now a heritage item - worth studying but no longer current. For the latest on Australian attitudes and media trends, go to <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blog/the-tribal-mind">The Tribal Mind</a>.

To discuss whether 3-D is just putting lipstick on a pig, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/tribal_avatar.html">The Tribal Mind</a>.
To nominate the most interesting and the most embarrassing Australian movies of the past 30 years, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/who_we_are_cine.html">Who We Are</a>.

<b>The ratings race, updated 10 am Sunday</b>
Channel Seven narrowly won the week. If this column's theory of <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/03/te_tribal_mind_2.html">a political link</a> is correct, Kevin Rudd will enjoy a small bump in the opinion polls.

The prime time audience shares for the week ended up like this: ABC3 0.4%; SBSTWO 0.4%; ONE 1.3; ABC2 1.3; 7TWO 2.6; GO 2.6; SBS1 3.8; ABC1 12.1; All Pay Stations 15.2; Ten 17.0; Nine 20.0; Seven 20.6; .

This was Pay TV's account of itself for the week: "The match between Parramatta and Cronulla, Live: NRL Eels v Sharks on FOX Sports was seen by 317,000 viewers. Parramatta's clash with Manly earlier in the week was watched by 309,000 people (FOX Sports). In Australian Rules football, Live: AFL St Kilda v Essendon was watched by 251,000 viewers and Live: AFL Richmond v Hawthorn had 179,000 viewers.
Other top programs include: <em>Selling Houses</em> on The Lifestyle Channel: 170,000 TV viewers; <em>Project Runway</em> on ARENA: 127,000 viewers; <em>Family Guy</em> on FOX8: 122,000 viewers; A<em>merican Idol</em> Performance Show on FOX8: 97,000 viewers and <em>Law & Order: SVU</em> on TV1: 80,000 viewers.
"In week 21, subscription TV channels had 21.2% of all metropolitan viewing between 6am and midnight, 20.2% of all regional viewing and 54.8% of all viewing in subscription TV homes."
<b>What Australia watched, week ending May 22</b>
<img alt="bluemccune.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/bluemccune.jpg" width="197" height="294" /> Description	Total	Sydney	Melbourne	Brisbane	Adelaide	Perth
1	SEVEN NEWS - SUN	Seven	1,843,000	493,000	548,000	346,000	193,000	264,000
2	MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA - CHALLENGE	Ten	1,675,000	443,000	553,000	287,000	165,000	227,000
3	MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA	Ten	1,675,000	452,000	564,000	270,000	181,000	208,000
4	UNDERBELLY: THE GOLDEN MILE	Nine	1,644,000	573,000	503,000	247,000	145,000	177,000
5	NINE NEWS SUNDAY	Nine	1,552,000	424,000	478,000	322,000	165,000	162,000
6	MODERN FAMILY	Ten	1,549,000	448,000	488,000	251,000	173,000	190,000
7	SUNDAY NIGHT	Seven	1,502,000	416,000	421,000	308,000	162,000	195,000
8	NCIS	Ten	1,485,000	445,000	397,000	271,000	181,000	190,000
9	SEVEN NEWS	Seven	1,473,000	397,000	416,000	282,000	154,000	222,000
10	SEVEN NEWS - SAT	Seven	1,457,000	406,000	369,000	313,000	151,000	218,000
11	AUSTRALIA'S GOT TALENT	Seven	1,431,000	447,000	417,000	244,000	129,000	194,000
12	THE FORCE - BEHIND THE LINE	Seven	1,384,000	392,000	418,000	239,000	152,000	183,000
13	TODAY TONIGHT	Seven	1,370,000	357,000	384,000	273,000	157,000	200,000
14	TWO AND A HALF MEN	Nine	1,351,000	354,000	466,000	244,000	102,000	185,000
15	60 MINUTES	Nine	1,338,000	413,000	402,000	284,000	100,000	139,000
16	SEND IN THE DOGS	Nine	1,319,000	363,000	422,000	229,000	142,000	162,000
17	NINE NEWS	Nine	1,312,000	366,000	422,000	259,000	127,000	139,000
18	GLEE	Ten	1,308,000	353,000	422,000	258,000	126,000	149,000
19	CUSTOMS	Nine	1,289,000	364,000	419,000	224,000	135,000	147,000
20	A CURRENT AFFAIR	Nine	1,243,000	352,000	424,000	227,000	112,000	128,000
21	BORDER SECURITY (R)	Seven	1,228,000	334,000	378,000	222,000	140,000	154,000
22	SEA PATROL	Nine	1,224,000	369,000	386,000	199,000	142,000	129,000
Continued <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_78.html">here</a>  ]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_78.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_78.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Tribal Mind</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 19:22:16 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>WHO WE ARE: Never mind the quality, feel the prejudice</title>
         <description><![CDATA[To learn the real reasons people over 55 don't watch <em>MasterChef</em>, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/new_tribal_on_m.html">The Tribal Mind</a>.

<strong>A column about Australia by David Dale, published in <em>The Sun-Herald</em>, 16/5/2010</strong>
One of the finest films ever made in Australia will drop out of the box office top ten this week after being seen by less than 300,000 of us. How many times could I have written that sentence in the past 30 years?

It happens I'm talking about the war movie <em>Beneath Hill 60</em>, but I could have been discussing any of a vast array of well-reviewed, well-publicised dramas and comedies that fell victim to the entrenched prejudice that Ozflicks are either lame or depressing.

This doesn't mean, of course, that no Australian film has sold more than $3 million worth of tickets in the past 30 years. But an almost inverse relationship seems to be developing between commercial success and saying something interesting about Australian life. Consider these two charts.

<img alt="kidjack.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/kidjack.jpg" width="283" height="172" /> <strong>The most successful locally made films of the past 30 years</strong>
1 Crocodile Dundee (sold 9 million tickets in 1986)
2 Babe (5.5 million tickets in 1995)
3 Crocodile Dundee Two (4 million in 1988)
4 The Man from Snowy River (3.5m in 1982) 
5 Australia (3.5m in 2008)
6 Gallipoli (3m in 1981)
7 Happy Feet (3m in 2006)
8 Mad Max 2 (3m in 1981)
9 Moulin Rouge (3m in 2001)
10 Strictly Ballroom (3m in 1992)

<img alt="madmax.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/madmax.jpg" width="166" height="166" /> <strong>The most interesting locally made films of the past 30 years</strong> 
1 Lantana (sold 1.3 million tickets in 2001)
3 Gallipoli (3m in 1981)
4 Two Hands (700,000 in 1999)
5 Oscar and Lucinda (250,000 in 1998)
7 Rabbit Proof Fence (900,000 in 2002)
8 Muriel's Wedding (2.3m in 1994)
7 Beneath Hill 60 (250,000 in 2010)
8 Shine (1.4m in 1996)
9 Kenny (800,000 in 2006)
10 The Castle (1.3m in 1997).

The first chart comes from dividing each film's earnings by the average ticket price in the year of release. Three movies - <em>Babe, Happy Feet,</em> and <em>Moulin Rouge</em> -- could have been made anywhere (unless you want to argue that George Miller and Baz Luhrman are gifted directors purely because of their Australianness).

Only one movie - <em>Gallipoli</em> - appears on both charts, and it comes from a decade when Australians were still enthusiastic about their own stories. The second chart is of course subjective, based on my favourites that could only have been made here. It's simply a conversation starter, and I'm happy to replace any of the entries with films you nominate by going to Comments. 

You might prefer some of my runners-up --  <em>Malcolm, Getting' Square, Ten Canoes, Little Fish, Looking for Alibrandi</em> -- or something completely different. While you're at that web address, nominating the flicks you found most interesting, how about nominating the most embarrassing Australian flicks of the past 30 years (I'll start the ball rolling with <em>I Love You Too</em>, currently showing in certain cinemas). And tell us why you think Australian films are so on the nose with Australians, and what we ought to do about it. This background information might be useful ..

Australia is the fourth most movie-loving nation of the world , with per capita attendances just behind Singapore, Iceland and Ireland, and just ahead of America and South Korea.  Some 70 per cent of us go to the cinema at least once a year (seven times a year, on average). The most frequent cinemagoers are people aged 14-24 (84 per cent of them average nine visits). In that age group, males slightly outnumber females. The least enthusiastic cinema goers are people over 50 (only 50 per cent go at least once a year, with females outnumbering males). 

<strong>Now go to Comments to nominate your favourites, your most disliked and your solutions. </strong>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/who_we_are_cine.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/who_we_are_cine.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 06:31:20 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Tribal Mind: A blowtorch to the belly of MasterChef</title>
         <description><![CDATA[To discuss the most interesting and the most embarrassing Australian movies of the past 30 years, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/who_we_are_cine.html">Who We Are</a>.

<strong>by David Dale</strong>
THIS is what is wrong with <em>MasterChef</em>: It cynically manipulates the emotions of contestants and audience; it overdramatises to the point of nausea; it turns what should be a relaxing pleasure into a tense competition; it is tediously repetitious; it emphasises esoteric ingredients and techniques that are irrelevant to family cooking; there are too many ads; judge Matt is pompous and pretentious; judge George is crude and eats with his mouth open.

And that, gentle reader, is why people over 55 don't watch <em>MasterChef</em>. And this is what is wrong with the Tribal Mind column: it engaged in cheap ageism, which is just as bad as cheap racism. 

<img alt="miceye.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/miceye.jpg" width="171" height="275" /> All of those things I learned from the reader reaction to last week's column, in which I speculated on why <em>MasterChef</em> rates well with every demographic except viewers over the age of 55 (click <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_tribal_mind_113.html">here</a> to read that).  I wondered if some senior citizens might be disturbed by <em>MasterChef</em>'s embrace of cultural diversity.

Most of the 109 readers who reacted to this were in disagreement. Mary Nixon was among the more polite: "The interminable ads, the relentless cross-selling, the tedious delivery of the presenters desperately trying to inject some suspense into their elimination processes, the idea that Matt Preston would be considered a 'New Talent' (see Logies) in any parallel universe. No, I don't think it is racism, you idiot. You have not captured the zeitgeist; you have played the 'racism card' clumsily and egregiously, without a vestige of support for your disgraceful thesis. Pauline Hanson would so love you - you are better than she is at division and alienation. Shame on you."

The reaction fell into three main groups, in increasing order of size: 1 Readers who felt sorry for older viewers who are missing great nightly entertainment; 2 Readers over 55 who enjoy <em>MasterChef</em> and who doubt OzTAM's ratings survey; 3 Readers over 55 who refuse to watch for these sorts of reasons:

"It's the phoney, repugnant emotionalism where everyone has to cry and be 'passionate' that turns me off. I recognise the younger generations find this sort of spurious nonsense appealing, but I don't see why the 55+ mob should have to put up with this weepy, big-eyed rubbish." (Bob)

"This is the most over-edited, artificially constructed show I have ever seen. The present-tense comments of competitors, which are so obviously recorded after the event, are simply insulting to viewers, and the contestants seem to be manipulated into a state of high emotion leading to embarrassingly schmaltzy tears and hugging when someone is eliminated. The way the results are left hanging before each (interminably long) commercial break is puerile and infuriating. It's like the old radio serials. Give me <em>Italian Food Safari</em> any day!" (Gil Appleton)

"Perhaps older people have achieved a level of discernment which the swinish multitude have yet to acquire. I do not watch any of the low-level so-called 'entertainment' on commercial TV." (Bill Streat)

"I think we are so OVER cooking, having done it for 35 years or so while raising a family. So watching cooking on TV ...  doesn't constitute something new and exciting but something we'd rather FORGET!!" (Amber)

"'Greater diversity' of food has been welcomed and embraced by thousands of Australians, all now over 55, since the 1950s. Ninety percent of students in my high-school classes in the '50s were from Europe and we Australians developed an appetite for their interesting lunches. Perhaps <em>MasterChef</em> is just not interesting to older people, including myself, who'd rather be out and about trying some new eateries than watching television." (Leonie Royle)

Suitably chastened, I nevertheless remain puzzled by one detail. Last Tuesday night, 306,000 viewers over the age of 55 watched <em>MasterChef</em>, while 626,000 viewers over the age of 55 watched <em>Australia's got Talent</em>, starring the Black Bogie winner Kyle Sandilands. Is this an example of mature discernment? ]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/new_tribal_on_m.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/new_tribal_on_m.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Tribal Mind</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 14:57:28 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Who We Are update: Week 20</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This week's forum is now a heritage item - worth studying but no longer current. For the latest on Australian attitudes and media trends, go to <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blog/the-tribal-mind">The Tribal Mind</a>.

To discuss the most interesting and the most embarrassing Australian movies of the past 30 years, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/who_we_are_cine.html">Who We Are</a>.
To learn the real reasons people over 55 don't watch <em>MasterChef</em>, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/new_tribal_on_m.html">The Tribal Mind</a>.

<b>The ratings race, updated 10am Sunday</b>
Channel Nine is winning the year, largely because of <em>Underbelly 3</em> and <em>2.5 Men</em>. Seven's strongest show is <em>Australia's Got Talent</em>, which is propped up by viewers over 55 who don't watch <em>MasterChef</em>. If this column's theory of <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/03/te_tribal_mind_2.html">a political link</a> is correct, Tony Abbott's rise in the opinion polls will parallel Nine's rise in the ratings. Channel Seven needs to pull a rabbit out of its hat, just like Kevin Rudd.

The prime time audience shares for the week ended up like this: ABC3 0.4%; SBSTWO 0.4%; ONE 1.1; ABC2 1.4; 7TWO 2.6; GO 2.6; SBS1 3.8; ABC1 12.2; All Pay Stations 15.0; Ten 16.9; Seven 20.5; Nine 20.9.

This was Pay TV's account of itself: "Monday night Live: NRL Roosters v Cowboys coverage on Fox Sports was the most viewed program of the week with 242,000 viewers, closely followed by the Sunday afternoon Live: AFL Adelaide v Richmond broadcast with 236,000 viewers. The early Wednesday morning Fox Sports 2 coverage of Live: ICC World Twenty was viewed by 94,000 people.

"On Wednesday night, Lifestyle Channel's <em>Selling Houses Australia</em> had 152,000 viewers and FOX8's animation programming had a strong week with a trio of programs scoring well: Family Guy was watched by 118,000 viewers on Tuesday night, <em>Futurama</em> had 117,000 on Wednesday night and <em>The Simpsons</em> was seen by 95,000 on Sunday night. <em>Project Runway</em> on Arena was watched by 88,000 people, <em>Hannah Montana</em> on Disney Channel was seen by 77,000 people and <em>Captive for 18 Years</em> premiered on Crime & Investigation with 77,000 viewers.

"In week 20, subscription TV channels had 21.2% of all metropolitan viewing between 6am and midnight, STV was 20.1% of all regional viewing and 54.4% of all viewing in subscription TV homes."


<b>What Australia watched, week ending May 15</b>
<img alt="sigridthornton.jpg" src="http://blogs.smh.com.au/entertainment/sigridthornton.jpg" width="120" height="160" /> Description	Total	Sydney	Melbourne	Brisbane	Adelaide	Perth
1	UNDERBELLY: THE GOLDEN MILE	Nine	1,647,000	606,000	433,000	294,000	146,000	169,000
2	MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA	Ten	1,644,000	458,000	525,000	274,000	182,000	205,000
3	SEVEN NEWS - SUN	Seven	1,572,000	425,000	426,000	322,000	173,000	226,000
4	MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA - CHALLENGE	Ten	1,548,000	362,000	542,000	278,000	170,000	197,000
5	AUSTRALIA'S GOT TALENT	Seven	1,509,000	418,000	518,000	219,000	163,000	192,000
6	NINE NEWS SUNDAY	Nine	1,473,000	367,000	417,000	375,000	164,000	150,000
7	SEVEN NEWS	Seven	1,439,000	381,000	407,000	268,000	162,000	220,000
8	NCIS	Ten	1,422,000	373,000	382,000	305,000	164,000	199,000
9	TWO AND A HALF MEN	Nine	1,388,000	435,000	424,000	270,000	105,000	154,000
10	TODAY TONIGHT	Seven	1,353,000	340,000	387,000	262,000	159,000	204,000
11	SEVEN NEWS - SAT	Seven	1,341,000	348,000	362,000	286,000	145,000	200,000
12	BONDI RESCUE	Ten	1,328,000	384,000	373,000	264,000	137,000	170,000
13	NINE NEWS	Nine	1,293,000	359,000	429,000	254,000	126,000	124,000
14	SUNDAY NIGHT	Seven	1,289,000	335,000	388,000	262,000	128,000	176,000
15	TOP GEAR	Nine	1,282,000	345,000	388,000	276,000	122,000	151,000
16	THE MENTALIST	Nine	1,262,000	416,000	384,000	217,000	117,000	128,000
Continued <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_77.html">here</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_77.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_77.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 09:06:00 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Tribal Mind: How MasterChef is destroying an election strategy</title>
         <description><![CDATA[To learn how readers voted on the worst of Australian television, click on <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/bogie_results.html">The Bogies 2010</a>.

<strong>by David Dale</strong>
HERE'S the mystery: why is <em>MasterChef</em>, a show that has apparently taken the nation by storm, so repugnant to viewers over the age of 55 - not just ignored by them, but actively avoided? That was the one question not addressed at a seminar held last weekend at the Noosa Food Festival, but it's a question this column hopes to answer today.

The title of the seminar was "The <em>MasterChef</em> Phenomenon", and for once the word was not hype. Whether <em>MasterChef</em> is causing a cultural transformation in Australia or symbolising a transformation that has already happened, it is much more than a TV show. It represents what the marketers would call a Brand, busily being "leveraged across multiple platforms", and what the sociologists would call a tipping point.

<img alt="curry.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/curry.jpg" width="269" height="179" /> The crystallising moment happened two weeks ago when Adele, a contestant of Italian background, served up little pastries called crostoli to George, a judge of Greek background, watched by contestants Jimmy, of Indian background, and Alvin, of Malaysian background, who were the other finalists in a challenge to make the dish they remembered most fondly from childhood.

George frowned and remarked that there was something missing. Adele looked worried. What they needed, he said, was a cup of espresso made in a macchinetta [small percolator], "so we could sit over these crostoli and chat for hours". Everyone beamed in agreement.

Pauline Hanson doesn't stand a chance after <em>MasterChef</em>. Its worshippers embrace a powerful belief system: Australia is the most entertaining place to live on earth, because our history of immigration has created an endless array of pleasures.

<img alt="chopsticks.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/chopsticks.jpg" width="194" height="295" /> It would only take a few challenges involving the preparation of Tamil food (such as kotthu rotti, lamb curry with chopped pancake) and Afghan food (such as chapli kabab, spiced minced beef patties) to make boat people the most welcome of new arrivals and destroy Tony Abbott's election campaign. 

At the seminar, Matt Preston said <em>MasterChef</em> has become  "the biggest cooking show in the history of the world". We learned that 56 production workers record 5000 hours of film, from which 46 editors craft the 80 hours we'll see on air (plus cookbooks, kitchenware and, as of next week, a monthly magazine).

The nightly episodes average 1.5 million viewers in the mainland capitals, a rare result in the fragmented market that is 21st century television. Channel Ten likes to boast that <em>MasterChef</em> regularly tops the night in "all key demographics", by which they mean children, males and females aged 16-39, males and females 25-54, and Occupational Groups 1 and 2 (the rich).

But there's one demographic missing from the fan club -- viewers over 55. In last week's ratings chart, <em>MasterChef</em> ranked number 2 (after <em>Underbelly</em>) with the other groups, and number 63 with viewers over 55.

On Sundays, the geriatrics watch repeats of <em>Border Security</em> while the rest of the country is watching <em>MasterChef.</em> On Mondays, the gerries watch <em>Find My Family</em>. On Tuesdays they watch <em>Australia's Got Talent</em>; on Wednesdays, <em>Dog Squad</em>; on Thursdays <em>Catalyst</em> and on Fridays, <em>Better Homes and Gardens</em>. So they have nothing against talent quests, nothing against reality shows, and nothing against cooking, but everything against the show everyone else adores.

For heaven's sake, why? What's not to like about a finely crafted comedy melodrama in which charming people strive to achieve their dreams?

Here's the theory. <em>MasterChef</em> celebrates diversity. It could not exist without the national obsession with multicultural cooking. Could it be that the oldies are the last bastion of xenophobia in this otherwise generous land? Are the over 55s responsible for the opinion polls that suggest Australians are opposed to immigration?  If so, are the politicians who pander to what they imagine to be the racist underbelly of this country actually wasting their time trying to please people who won't be around to complain about the effects of greater diversity?

Go to Comments to offer any other explanation for why <em>MasterChef</em> alienates the ageing.
]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_tribal_mind_113.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_tribal_mind_113.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Tribal Mind</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 18:42:22 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Who We Are update: Week 18</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This week's forum is now a heritage item - worth studying but no longer current. For the latest on Australian attitudes and media trends, go to <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blog/the-tribal-mind">The Tribal Mind</a>.

To learn the awful truth about <em>MasterChef</em>, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_tribal_mind_113.html">The Tribal Mind</a>.

To learn how readers voted on the worst of Australian television, click on <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/bogie_results.html">The Bogies 2010</a>.

<b>The ratings race, updated 10am Sunday</b>
Channel Nine is winning the year, largely because of <em>Underbelly 3</em>. If this column's theory of <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/03/te_tribal_mind_2.html">a political link</a> is correct, Tony Abbott will enjoy a parallel rise in the opinion polls. Channel Seven needs to pull a rabbit out of its hat, just like Kevin Rudd.

The prime time audience shares for the week ended up like this: ABC3 0.3%; SBSTWO 0.4%; ONE 0.9; ABC2 1.4; 7TWO 2.6; GO 2.7; SBS1 3.8; ABC1 11.3; All Pay Stations 15.1; Ten 17.4; Seven 20.2; Nine 21.5.

This was Pay TV's account of itself: "Subscription TV celebrated another successful week of sport and entertainment: Live: NRL Sea Eagles v Dragons topped the week with 205,000 viewers; AFL Live: AFL Brisbane Lions v Fremantle scored 204,000 viewers; Live: Football: EPL Liverpool v Chelsea was watched by 98,000 and Live: Rugby Union: S14 Hurr v Reds had 93,000 viewers (all on FOX Sports).

"<em>Selling Houses Australia</em> on Lifestyle Channel was the highest rated entertainment program with 145,000 viewers, <em>Hannah Montana</em> on Disney Channel was seen by 116,000 viewers and <em>The Simpsons</em> on FOX8 was seen by 110,000 people. <em>NCIS</em> on TV1 was watched by 91,000 people, Eastenders on UKTV was seen by 79,000 people, P<em>roject Runway</em> on Arena had 70,000 viewers and the premiere of <em>Iceland Volcano Disaster</em> on National Geographic was seen by 57,000 people.

"In week 19, subscription TV channels had 21.8% of all metropolitan viewing between 6am and midnight, 19.6% of all regional viewing and 54.9% of all viewing in subscription TV homes."

<b>What Australia watched, week ending May 8</b>
Description   Total   Sydney   Melbourne   Brisbane   Adelaide   Perth   
  1   SEVEN NEWS - SUN   Network 7   1,816,000   421,000   618,000   339,000   156,000   281,000   
  2   MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA   Network TEN   1,541,000   435,000   491,000   249,000   165,000   201,000   
  3   MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA - CHALLENGE   Network TEN   1,532,000   451,000   512,000   199,000   172,000   199,000   
  4   NCIS   Network TEN   1,509,000   412,000   414,000   312,000   170,000   201,000   
  5   NINE NEWS SUNDAY   Network 9   1,476,000   491,000   441,000   224,000   165,000   155,000   
  6   AUSTRALIA'S GOT TALENT   Network 7   1,461,000   420,000   451,000   220,000   143,000   226,000   
  7   SEVEN NEWS   Network 7   1,446,000   365,000   418,000   287,000   157,000   220,000   
  8   52ND ANNUAL TV WEEK LOGIE AWARDS   Network 9   1,402,000   438,000   498,000   221,000   129,000   116,000   
  9   CUSTOMS   Network 9   1,396,000   440,000   487,000   186,000   132,000   152,000   
  10   TODAY TONIGHT   Network 7   1,369,000   331,000   392,000   277,000   157,000   212,000   
  11   SEVEN NEWS - SAT   Network 7   1,367,000   395,000   385,000   294,000   121,000   172,000   
  12   SEND IN THE DOGS   Network 9   1,357,000   413,000   473,000   182,000   148,000   141,000   
  13   BONES   Network 7   1,351,000   382,000   396,000   228,000   163,000   183,000   ]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_76.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/the_who_we_are_76.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">whoweare-index</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 17:22:33 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Here&apos;s how you voted in The Bogies of 2010</title>
         <description><![CDATA[To suggest what Malcolm Turnbull should do next, go to <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/whoweare_turnbi.html">Who We Are</a>.

by David Dale
RUPERT Murdoch is an honourable man. That's why we know a dignified apology is currently on its way to <em>The Sydney Morning Herald</em> expressing his regret over the scandal that has come to be known as Bogiegate. Murdoch had barely digested the revelation that some of his minions were involved in the Melbourne Storm secret payments debacle when he learned that another embarrassment was about to engulf his organisation. A different group of News Corp minions had attempted to steal The Bogie Awards, which have been conducted by this column since time immemorial (2007).

The matter is currently the subject of legal letters, so we can only say that last Wednesday <em>The Daily Telegraph</em>, in a blatant act of plagiarism, launched a reader poll about the worst of television under the heading "Pick your Bogies". This was just at the moment when this column was counting votes sent in by readers for the fourth annual Bogie Awards.

While we await reparations from Mr Murdoch, we are proud to announce the result of that count. These are the original (and only genuine) Bogies for 2010, with the number of reader votes for each nominee:

<img alt="julbert.jpg" src="http://blogs.smh.com.au/sit/julbert.jpg" width="225" height="324" /> <strong>Most effable female personality (the Westacott orb):</strong> Amber Higlett (<em>Weekend Today</em>) 1 vote; Samantha Armytage (Seven 4.30 news) 2; Ruby Rose (<em>The 7pm Project</em>) 2;  Kerry Armstrong (<em>Bed of Roses</em>) 2;  Juanita Phillips (ABC news) 3; Lisa Wilkinson (<em>Today</em>) 4; Sara Groen (Seven weather) 5; Poh Ling Yeow (<em>Poh's Kitchen</em>) 9; Natalie Bassingthwaighte (<em>So You Think You Can Dance Australia</em>) 12; Julia Zemiro (<em>Rockwiz</em>) 16. And the winner, with 18 votes is Myf Warhurst (<em>Spicks and Specks</em>).

<strong>Most effable male personality:</strong> Kyle Sandilands (<em>Australia's Got Talent</em>) 1; Firass Dirani (<em>Underbelly</em>) 2; Charlie Pickering (<em>The 7pm Project</em>) 2; Wil Traval (<em>Underbelly</em>) 4;  Vince Colosimo (<em>Australian Families of Crime)</em> 4; Mark Ferguson (Seven news) 5; Josh Thomas (<em>Talkin' 'Bout Your Generation</em>) 5; Shaun Micalleff (<em>Talkin Bout Your Generation</em>) 6; Jeremy Lindsay Taylor (<em>Sea Patrol</em>) 12. And the winners, with 15 votes each, are Adam Hills (<em>Spicks and Specks</em>) and Hamish Blake (everything).

<strong>Least mobile facial features:</strong> Bert Newton 2; Courtney Cox (<em>Cougartown</em>) 3; Liz Hayes (<em>60 Minutes</em>) 4; Sigrid Thornton (<em>Underbelly</em>) 6; Marcia Cross (<em>Desperate Housewives</em>) 9. And the winners, with 24 votes each, are Tracey Grimshaw (<em>A Current Affair</em>) and Julianna Margulies (<em>The Good Wife</em>).

<img alt="johanna.jpg" src="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/johanna.jpg" width="225" height="353" /> <strong>Most unnecessary revival of a spent idea</strong>: <em>The Pacific</em> 1; <em>20 to 1</em> 5; <em>The Block</em> 7; <em>V</em> 8; Matty Johns 11; And the winner, with 38 votes, is <em>Hey Hey It's Saturday</em>. 

<strong>Most blatant ripoff of another station's hit:</strong> <em>The Spearman Experiment</em> 2; <em>Gangs of Oz</em> 3; <em>Sunday Night</em> 3; <em>The White Room</em> 3; <em>Customs</em> 13. And the winner, with 45 votes, is <em>My Kitchen Rules</em>.

<strong>Best use of breasts to exploit viewers' base instincts:</strong> <em>Satisfaction</em> 2; <em>Ghost Whisperer</em> 2; <em>True Blood</em> 9; <em>Nigella Express</em> 14. And the winner, with 34 votes, is <em>Underbelly 3</em>.

<strong>Most unnecessary personality:</strong> Kylie Gillies 2; Ruby Rose 4; Fifi Box 13; Karl Stefanovic 14. And the winner, with 27 votes, is Ricki-Lee Coulter.

<strong>Furthest fallen from former finery:</strong> <em>Scrubs</em> 1; <em>Top Gear</em> 1; <em>Brothers and Sisters</em> 1; <em>House</em> 8; <em>Grey's Anatomy</em> 10; <em>Desperate Housewives</em> 11<em>; Heroes</em> 12. And the winner, with 21 votes, is <em>Lost</em>.

<strong>Most annoying person:</strong> Dannii Minogue 1; Grant Denyer 1; Melissa Doyle 1; Georgie Parker 3; Danny Weidler 4; Dave Hughes 5; Steven Jacobs 5; Andrew O'Keefe 9; David Koch 20. And the winner, with 26 votes, is Eddie McGuire.

<strong>Most missed:</strong> <em>The Gruen Transfer</em> 1; <em>Rove</em> 1; <em>Prison Break</em> 1; <em>Big Brother</em> 3; <em>Newstopia</em> 9; <em>The Glasshouse</em> 10; <em>Enough Rope</em> 17. And the winner, with 21 votes, is <em>The Chaser</em>.
 
<strong>Most wooden presenter:</strong> Sandra Sully 8; Natalie Bassingthwaighte 27. And the winner, with 30 votes, is Hayley Lewis. 

<strong>Most embarrassing program (the Naomi Robson Cup):</strong> <em>Stargate Atlantis</em> 1; <em>Wipeout</em> 1; <em>The Biggest Loser</em> 7; <em>Today Tonight</em> 19; <em>Hey Hey It's Saturday</em> 22. And the winner, with 26 votes, is <em>A Current Affair</em>.

<strong>Furthest past use-by date (the Bert Newton Trophy):</strong> Red Symons 1; Mike Munro 1; <em>Midsomer Murders</em> 1; Kerri-Anne Kennerley 2; Bert Newton 5; Richard Wilkins 21. And the winner, with 35 votes, is Daryl Somers.

<strong>The Black Bogie (the Eddie McGuire Chalice):</strong> Andrew O'Keefe 5; David Koch 9; Eddie McGuire 23. And the winner, for the third consecutive year, with 34 votes, is Kyle Sandilands.

To study all the readers' votes, click <a href="http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/04/tribal_bogies.html">here</a>. Go to Comments to augment. 
]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/bogie_results.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare/archives/2010/05/bogie_results.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Tribal Mind</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 16:42:19 +0900</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>

