Who We Are

Advertisement

WHO WE ARE: Aussie film-making, or the zombie walks

Australia's smartest forum about popular culture has moved to The Tribal Mind

A column about Australia by David Dale, published in The Sun-Herald, 30/5/2010
ZOMBIES are so hot right now, so I'm going to apply the label to the Australian film industry. Every time you think it's dead, buried and nibbled by maggots, it staggers out of the grave and gives a shocking insight into what Australians want in homegrown entertainment.

The latest revelation from our zombie industry is this: we want slapstick gags, stupid heroes, girls in bikinis, lame dialogue, cultural stereotypes and disco dancing. And here's what we don't want: strong characters, intelligent acting, historical accuracy and thoughtful analysis of issues.

gangi.jpg Two weeks ago this column lamented that that Beneath Hill 60 was dropping out of the box office chart with total earnings of $3 million in six weeks. I asked readers to explain the depressing state of the industry (Go to Never mind the quality to read that column and the responses).

Last week Kings of Mykonos: Wog Boys 2 pranced onstage and made $2.3 million in its first seven days, which suggests it will go on to match the $11.5 million earned by its predecessor exactly ten years ago. The zombie walks.

An answer may be found in the thoughtful responses sent in by readers. J Barrie wrote: "What ails our filmmaking is poor scripts -- lightweight storytelling lacking subplots and character layers, while producers ignore fine Australian published novels that have already gone through a thorough authorial editing process.

"Secondly, while we have fine technical people, we suffer from poor direction, undisciplined production standards ... Many Australian films these days look like home movies, and if producers/directors want to make films that are personal statements, they can hardly complain if they screen briefly in an art house cinema."

Mitchell Hall declares: " Showbusiness is about risk. What Australian film takes a risk? Name me one Australian movie in the last ten years that's had one special effect in it"

Harry Georgatos asks: "Why can't there be an Aussie sci-fi film or an Aussie spy film or an Aussie graphic novel franchise or an Aussie paranormal movie or an Aussie conspiracy/assassin movie? Most people go to the movies for entertainment. I saw Animal Kingdom. It was a depressive experience watching these dead-bit losers. This film will be called an Australian masterpiece. This is a film for critics."

Matthew from the Hunter Valley suggested "four major reasons why audiences stay away: 1) The films are uninteresting to them. Basically: they're boring. If you make niche films, expect niche audiences.
2) The filmmakers don't know what their film is really about. If you make a thriller, have thrills! If you make a comedy, make 'em laugh!
3) The films have misguided or zero media exposure. A lot of Australian films fail to do audience testing. Our taglines tend to aim for poetry but come off as vague; our posters tend to miss the point and the film titles themselves sometimes even mislead the viewer as to what genre film to expect. I love Beneath Hill 60, but where is the tunnel on the poster?
4) Audiences have been burned before."

Go to Comments to continue this discussion.

David Dale is the author of The Little Book of Australia -- A snapshot of who we are (Allen and Unwin). For daily updates on Australian attitudes, bookmark blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare.

COMMENTS

David,
Love your work. Loved "Beneath Hill 60."Your readers comments on the failings of the Australian Film industry are generally pretty accurate but we have to look a little deeper to see why the industry has the problems it has. I have been trying for many years to get a film made on the subject of my published book and have therefore worked with various writers and directors as well as having numerous discussions with those in the industry including the various fuding bodies. Based on my experience it is very clear that many of the problems in the industry can be attributed to the way the industry is funded and therefore the way it operates at its core. Virtually the entire focus of those in the industry is to keep themselves employed, in the industry. They therefore work on projects which they know can get funding from the funding bodies etc. The funding bodies like to fund small budget films so they can share the funding around. (Sadly there can at times be a degree of nepotism and cronyism involved here too.Happy to provide you with specific examples off line.) The film makers therefore focus on small films with small casts, minimal sets, no special effects etc. The result then is so often what one of your readers called "niche films" that are very narrow in their appeal and often quite boring. An excellent example of this is "Samson and Delilah". That film was held up as an wonderful example of Australian film making and this is where our film critics such as David and Margaret have to take some responsibility. They raved about it, giving it 4 and 5 stars but let's face the truth about that film and the truth is that it was mind numbingly boring.
If you were an average film viewer and went to see that film based on the rave reviews, it would be a long time before you went to see another Australian Film. David and Margaret, then only gave "Beneath Hill 60" 3 and 3 and a half stars, so would you be rushing out to see it if the experts are telling you its not as good as Samson and Delilah?
Part of the flow on from the small budget issue then is that they don't then have the marketing budget to promote the films effectively. Having said that though, if the product is bad even a big marketing budget will only be of marginal assistance.
The solution ultimately lies with the Federal government . They must see an understand the problems with the industry and iyts funding model and adjust funding, legislation and tax laws accordingly.
The huge problem with my film is despite the fact it is an amazing and extremely gripping story (it is historically factual, so I'm not being boastful) is that because it is; a period piece, has a huge cast (over 60 characters) and is quite long it will require a big budget ($15mil+). It is therefore extremely unlikely to ever see the light of day.

  • by Peter on May 30, 2010 at 12:03 PM

Maybe there are too many movies that are made about Australians that most Australians can't relate to. "Beneath Hill 60" might be a brilliant movie but are the majority of Australians who go to see movies at the cinema, interested in the subject matter? A film like Wog Boy 2 is success because it is telling a story that the people who do go to the movies can relate to. It doesn't matter if it isn't wonderfully written or thought provoking. The audiences want to be entertained and this movie does that even if some people are embarrased by the quality. It also embraces Australia today, which is a multicultural country with people of many backgrounds. A lot of the audience would be so happy to see a story about people like themselves which they don't normally see on screen. Have you noticed that some of the most successful movies of recent years like The Castle, Muriel's Wedding and Strictly Ballroom also embraced diversity and reflected what Australia is really like, when so many other movies don't? The same is true on television with Packed to the Rafters and Underbelly. Even minor/supporting ethnic characters help show a more realistic Australia and people want to see that.

  • by Levendis on May 30, 2010 at 02:25 PM

The Australian film industry is dominated by white-anglos making films for the white-anglo chattering classes. They purport to speak on behalf of Aborigines and multicultural Australia but they come off as simply patronising. The average Aboriginal kid is lining up for Wog Boy 2.

  • by canoli on May 30, 2010 at 06:24 PM

The Wog Boy might not be Shakespeare or have deep and meaningful messages but it is entertaining and fun and that's what sells movie tickets.

  • by Trevor on May 31, 2010 at 11:13 AM

I worked on a government document analysing the state of the film industry in Australia. The summations were not pretty.
I think there's alot of docudrama eltist crap in our cinema and on TV, I can think of very few locally made film/TV that I've even been slightly interested in.
I think alot of the material preaches morals, it evokes a way we're supposed to think and live. Well they can shove it. Take me interests as they are or bugger off. You'll not suck me in to your lies and misconceptions.
Elitist crap. Disconnected. Out of touch. Self interested. Mutual Appreciation society. This is what I see when I look at our media.

  • by yobbo on May 31, 2010 at 01:45 PM

My God , for the past 10 years or so , there has hardly been a movie made in the country that hasnt had some sort of Native or aboriginal message to it. Its hard enough to get funding for any movie, but if you have a something relating to natives in it, kerching the coffers open!!!
Wog Boy 2 is racist !! it sterotypes greeks and italians, and should be removed from the screens straight away!!!

  • by Don on May 31, 2010 at 03:28 PM

Don, is it racist if it is made by Greeks and Italians though, who are taking the micky out of themselves? I think it's more a case of perpetuating ethnic stereotypes rather than being racist. This sort of movie is not my cup of tea but at least I can laugh at it. It's something I'd rather watch than heavy ones like the depressing druggie movies Candy or Little Fish.

  • by Antigoni on June 01, 2010 at 09:04 AM

Hi Antigoni, It really dosnt matter who its made by, in this country now, if you take the mickey out of a race or person, its racist. That was proven to us by a visiting Americian last year!!!
We seem to be missing the point about movies in this country, they are there to entertain us. Never saw Candy or Little Fish so ill take ur word for it.

  • by Don on June 01, 2010 at 10:07 AM

Don, I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious about the Wog Boy 2 being racist and taht Aiustralia being proven to be racist by a visiting Americian last year. But if you are, what's next? Will we determine that the 'The Castle' is classist because it makes fun of bogans?

  • by Bloke from the Sticks on June 04, 2010 at 09:15 AM

I want to comment on the Australian film and TV industry but first I'd like to add something to the point made above by Don about the visiting American. He was affronted by the light-hearted TV performance depicting the Jackson 5. This was reported as what seemed to be a major news item in the US. Certain talk-show hosts sensationalised it and accused Australia of being a "nation that time forgot" Well, talk about hypocrisy. A couple of days later I read about how some graduates of a particular US college known for catering for mostly black students, omitted that college from their resumes when applying for jobs because it immediately identified them as being Afro-American and therefore reduced their chances of getting an interview. Racism is still alive in the good ol' US of A.

Now to the Aussie film and TV industry. I think one of the problems is that it's dumbed down, probably to appeal to the lowest common denominator - the yobbo bogan. Many of the plots are lame and the acting is pathetic, quite often depicting Australians as an uneducated bunch who don't take anything seriously and who'd rather be in a pub than anywhere else. It seems to me that the producers and directors are living in a past world, say the unsophisticated 1950's.

  • by Tony on June 04, 2010 at 09:46 AM

Aren't most Australian movies just pretentious, elitist rubbish? When somebody makes a movie that isn't pretentious, elitist rubbish, then people actually go to see it. But then the critics and snobs will turn around and rubbish it.

  • by Warrigul on June 04, 2010 at 02:26 PM

Have you ever noticed that our reality shows always show a wider cross section of our multi-cultural community than our films and television series do.

  • by trevor on June 05, 2010 at 02:29 PM

What it really comes down to is that most Australian films are just not entertaining enough to attract a massive audience. There are so many movies made with a message about a certain subject or a niche audience in mind. Also, we don't make enough movies. If you have a look at the number of American movies that get released every year, some of them don't make it to Australian cinema screens, but some of them go straight to DVD and then again some of them never get released anywhere. It's true that we get swamped by American product but we end up getting the best of that. Then we compare the best of America with a about 15 movies that Australians make every year and wonder what went wrong. In comparison to what America produces, we should have one hit Australian movie a year, a couple of average movies and the rest underperforming at the box office, which is exactly what is happening. Australia needs to produce more movies to get a better chance of a hit movie.

  • by Fail Whale on June 06, 2010 at 12:35 AM

POST A COMMENT

Security code image.