Who We Are

Advertisement

WHO WE ARE: There once was a limerick contest/ From which we have chosen the ten best ...

... We hope ute and chilli,
Weren't requirements too silly.
And thank you for joining the love fest.

A column about Australia by David Dale, published in The Sun-Herald, 7/2/2010
The task was to compose a limerick that included the words chilli and ute. The prize for the ten wittiest was a copy of The Little Book of Australia. The total number of entries was 206.

Some readers transcended the temptation to rhyme the key words with willy and root; many found ways to make political statements; and several took the opportunity to dispute answers in the patriotic quiz this column constructed two weeks ago. For example, a question on who invented the Paddle Pop provoked this response:

"Dear David, As the great nieces of Edwin Street we definitely knew the answer to this question. But to our horror our answer did not correspond to your answer. We were the original taste testers of the Paddle Pop which was invented by our father, Ronald Street, the nephew of Edwin (better known as Ted). Ted actually told our father it would be 'a nine day wonder'. Our father proved Ted wrong as the Paddle Pop has been around for over 50 years. We will buy the next version of your Little Book of Australia when the correction has been made! Jennifer, Fiona and Philippa Street."

thongs.jpg I will send the Street sisters a copy of The Little Book, with the correction made by hand, and also give their father due recognition (along with their great-uncle) in the next edition. Their online comment inspired our first winner:

David Dale's quiz had some offended,
With a few answers that must be amended.
The three sisters Street
Gave some Paddle Pop heat.
Dave, your chilli-red ute's been rear-ended
(Suzanne)

In no particular order, these were the other recipients of The Little Book of Australia:

There once was a bowlful of chilli.
Aussies ate it and didn't feel silly.
They loved all the changes,
Different cultures and strangers,
And became friends in their Honda or ute.
(Amanda Taura)

Bruce and his mates in the ute
Gave chilli and tofu the boot.
They ran up the flags,
Barbied lamb and some snags,
Made burgers, of course, with beetroot!
(Kerrie Mead)

Kev once had a car-dealer ute,
That some people said was just loot.
Fair suck of the chilli!
The electorate is hilly.
How else was he meant to commute?
(Caz)

There once was a bloke with a ute
All the chicks thought it was beaut.
He liked to cook chilli
And show them his willy,
And sometimes it got him a root
(John & Sofia Wheeler)

There was a young man in a ute.
Was camped by a billabong, mute.
'Cause under the shade
Not some tea he had made
But spag bol, with chilli to boot!
(Pommie Git)

We Aussies are known for invention.
The ute's an example worth mention,
And the hoist made by Hilly,
Maybe spag bol with chilli.
But pavlova and thongs are exemption(s).
(Philip Kendall)

Oz bloke and shiela in ute.
Kids, dog and esky to boot.
Multicultural chilli.
Tea from the billi.
Our cuisine these days is a hoot!
(Graham Wood)

The ute, a type of a car,
Does not define who we are.
And equally silly
Is the notion that chilli
Projects our image afar.
(Greg Raffin)

There once was a farmer called Willi
Who planted genetically modified chilli.
When it started to shoot,
It devoured his ute.
I hope no one else is so silly!
(Ria Jansen)

You can read every entry, including the ones sent in by email, by going to limericks and more limericks.

To discuss why Avatar won't make $100 million, why Kristina Keneally will win the NSW election, and/ or why MasterChef won't get the same audience this year, go to The Tribal Mind.

David Dale is the author of The Little Book of Australia -- A snapshot of who we are (Allen and Unwin). For daily updates on Australian attitudes, bookmark blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare.

COMMENTS

My attempt wasn't listed, but I didn't think much of it either. Some of the winners were very good -- BUT -- only two had the 25 words maximum which you listed as a requirement in the Term & Conditions of entry, the others ranging from 29 to 32 words. So you obviously changed the rule and I unfortunately did not know. I did compose a couple that I thought a lot better than the one I submitted, but found it difficult to prune them down from 29 and 30 words to the 25 words or less requirement.
It is difficult to understand why you would award prizes to those who submitted entries with more than 25 words, unless you changed the rules after the competition started.
Bill Williams.

DD replies: In fact, your entry was published, but among the comments under the Answers to the quiz. You may only have looked at the comments under the Questions. Click on "more limericks", above.
The phrase about the 25 word limit was published in the printed version of The Sun-Herald without my knowledge, and really did not make much sense, since most limericks require at least 30 words. That limit was not published in the online version of the quiz. I decided, in fairness to the people who had only read the online version, to judge all entries -- even those who wrote limericks that were longer than five lines and who did not follow any traditional notion of limerick scansion. How about I judge an 11th prize, restricted only to entries of 25 words or less?

  • by Bill Williams on February 07, 2010 at 03:31 PM

Hi David, Congratulations to all of the witty winners, however I am feeling pretty cheesed off by your limerick competition. I followed the "rules" i.e 25 words or less and emailed my two limericks, as was a given option. I didn't go to the blog. I was taken aback this morning to see the considerable over-the- limit word count of all but two of your winners. I then went to the blog to look at "all of the limericks" and neither of mine (not offensive etc) were there, and so the email option for entry does not seem to have worked well. While looking through "all" of the entries on the blog, I stumbled upon the Q & A about the word count, and your response not to worry about keeping it to 25 words. Geez Louise!! Anyone who emailed their entry and either didn't look at the blog, or missed that Q & A weren't on a level playing field. Everyone knows that being able to use more words makes it easier to write something like a limerick. For an Australia Day comp, of all things, shouldn't it have been a Fair Go for everyone? I would have thought that printed rules are the way it is. Suggest that next comp, you write after the rules: "but just ignore all of the above." Jennifer Clements

DD replies: The only entry of yours I could find among the emails was this:
My ute "collected" Morelli,
Unharmed because of his belly,
Boasting chilli on toast
And an Aussie lamb roast,
Like that geezer promotes on the telly.

It was published among the Comments under the quiz answers. If there was another, please send it again.
As you can see from my response to Bill, above, the 25 word limit came as a surprise to me, when I saw the printed paper. Since half the contestants had not seen the 25 word limit, I thought going wide would be fairer than going narrow.
Sounds like I had better now run a separate contest, purely for the entries that were 25 words or less.

  • by Jennifer Clements on February 07, 2010 at 04:23 PM

Geez, Bill and Jen it's not fair
when rules are ignored that are there;
not much left to say
with the word count in play...

DD replies: But finish the verse if you dare.

  • by Anon on February 07, 2010 at 04:56 PM

..it's the bridal limerick stripped bare...

  • by Anon on February 07, 2010 at 05:15 PM

Hi David, thank you for your response. It was very fair of you to air the complaints. The steam has stopped coming out of my ears now that I understand how the 25 word limit was only stipulated in the paper, and that the competition was also announced on the website. Thanks for pointing me towards my poor little second effort. I didn't look under the comments for the quiz for the entered limericks, only in "limericks" and "more limericks" Thank you also for invitation to re-send the first limerick you didn't get. It was emailed at approx 9.30 am on Monday 25th Jan:
Bluey has gone own the chute
'Cause the coppers caught him a beaut
Down past Wollondilly
Floggin' kangaroo chilli
From his rusty, unregistered ute.
Jennifer Clements

  • by Jennifer Clements on February 08, 2010 at 06:21 AM

POST A COMMENT

Security code image.