Who We Are

Advertisement

The Tribal Mind: Divided, decimated and conquered

To learn how Australia became addicted to caffeine, go to Who We Are

by David Dale
AS THE old joke goes, there are two types of people in the world: those who say there are two types of people in the world, and those who find it more useful to divide the world into 10 types of people. The survey organisation Roy Morgan Research is in the second category. After four decades of interviewing thousands of Australians about their beliefs, hopes, fears, likes, and spending habits, Morgan has concluded that the 16 million adults in this land can be split among ten "value segments". Morgan's classification has been widely adopted by the advertising and marketing industry. Can you find yourself among these labels ...

myfwar.jpg Traditional Family Life (20.1 per cent of the community). According to Morgan, "generally aged 50-plus with grown children, this group is motivated by security, reliability and providing better opportunities for their families."

Visible Achievement (17.4 per cent). "Enjoy the tangible rewards of their success but, confident and individualistic, they do not feel the need to impress others. Practical and realistic, they seek quality and value for money." They seem to correspond with what the ratings agency OzTAM calls "Occupational Groups 1 and 2", which means their favourite TV shows include Packed To The Rafters, NCIS, Celebrity MasterChef and Spicks and Specks.

Socially Aware (14.4 per cent). "Community minded and socially active, people in this group have a strong sense of social responsibility. Always looking for something new and different, they tend to be early adopters and influencers." They watch the least amount of television of all the segments -- less than 2 hours a day.

midsomer.jpg Conventional Family Life (12.2 per cent, up from 10.8 per cent in 2006). This group, younger than the Traditionals, "devote their time and effort to family and their home - either building one or striving to improve it". They seem to correspond with what OzTAM calls "Grocery Buyers", which means their favourite TV shows include Packed To The Rafters, Midsomer Murders, RSPCA Animal Rescue, and Better Homes and Gardens.

Look at Me (11.5 per cent) "Younger, socially active, peer-driven people who are highly conscious of image and fashion ... their behaviour tends to be hedonistic and rebellious".

Young Optimism (7.7 per cent) "Associated with ambition and idealism, people in this group want to experience life - travel, career, friends, family, sport and social activity - and believe they can have it all. Usually students and young professionals, they are innovative and interested in technology." They rarely watch TV, but visit the cinema more than any other segment.

Something Better (6.5 per cent). "Competitive, ambitious and concerned about status and image and often extend their budget in order to demonstrate their success to others." They are the group most likely to subscribe to Pay TV.

Real Conservatism (4.8 per cent) "Usually mature people who hold conservative social, moral and ethical values, they seek a disciplined, ordered society that is safe and predictable."

Fairer Deal (3.2 per cent, down from 4.2 in 2006). "Usually associated with unskilled and semi-skilled workers ... more likely than others to experience unemployment and financial insecurity and subsequent family pressures. This can create a feeling that they are getting 'a raw deal' out of life."

Basic Needs (2.5 per cent). "Usually associated with retirees, pensioners or people living on social security payments ... a desire for security and order and a strong sense of community". Least likely of all the groups to go to the cinema, but most likely to watch 4 hours of television a day.

Go to Comments to discuss whether this is a legitimate way to slice society.

David Dale is the author of The Little Book of Australia -- A snapshot of who we are (Allen and Unwin). For daily updates on Australian attitudes, bookmark blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare.

COMMENTS

It's nice to know, in these times of Social Detachment, that there's someone out there thinking of you as a 'Value Segment'. You are not alone.
The only Segment I sort of fit into is 'Socially Aware'. But not precisely. I guess the 'Thoroughly Disenchanted' Segment doesn't really rate.
David, a question: Do these Researchers still go for phone polling or have they yet discovered the Power of the Internet (POTI)? With news articles in the last few weeks about Google having access to your Gmail emails even after they've been deleted and Britain storing the details of everyone's phonecalls and emails for up to 12 months, isn't there an obvious tool for finding out not only what people actually watch but what they would like to watch? Just compile the several billion web searches of people giving free rein to their innermost desires and see what you get. Mostly porn but there would be other stuff in there.
Saw Leigh Sales interview Watthew Weiner (The Sopranos, MadMen) the other night on 'Late Line' and he was talking about the loyalty of a relatively small group of discerning viewers which has ensured that 'MadMen' continues and encouraged him to keep aiming for Quality and not Dumbness. Seems to me the Researchers could get better aim at their targets by using Google's files. Not for targetting advertising per se but for predicting what consumers will sit through while being advertised at instead of coming along after and making a list of what they didn't hate.

Tribal Mind replies: Morgan's values research is based on face to face interviews -- they knock on your door with a clipboard. The problem with trying to use net behaviour to analyse society is that 30 per cent of Australians never go on the net. They would presumably be "Basic needs", "Fairer deal" and "Real conservatism".

  • by darren on November 14, 2009 at 06:01 AM

I propose a group 11, namely cynics who don't believe what market research groups come up with -- after all, it is a product they are trying to sell, and they have targetted their market with it -- insecure business people who can't think for themselves.
Now what percentage would the group 11 be? I propose 89.3%, meaning the other 10.7% make up the other 10 groups + the informals who didn't vote, couldn't vote, wouldn't vote or couldn't be hammered into the pre-determined round holes.

  • by Professor Rosseforp on November 17, 2009 at 10:45 PM

Pay attention and check your 10 types...
How about these two types of men currently being surveyed that connect their personality and behaviour because of how they adjust their pants when using a toilet.

  • by Thomas Bishop on November 17, 2009 at 11:54 PM

Sign me up for Group 11, please. I never fit into any of the labels used for these stupid surveys.

  • by meg on November 18, 2009 at 03:37 PM

POST A COMMENT

Security code image.