Who We Are

Advertisement

WHO WE ARE: Just smart enough?

To discuss if Transformers 2 sucks more than any blockbuster in history, go to The Tribal Mind.

A column about Australia by David Dale, published in The Sun-Herald, 12/7/2009
By now Australia was supposed to have changed from the lucky country to the clever country. But the Bureau of Statistics keeps releasing data which suggests most of us are too dumb to function in the 21st century.

The bureau's latest discovery is that we don't even know how to look after our own bodies - 59 per cent of Australians "have difficulty with tasks such as locating information on a bottle of medicine about the maximum number of days the medicine could be taken, or drawing a line on a container indicating where one third would be". This follows the revelation last year that 69 per cent of adults lack problem-solving skills that are "the minimum required for individuals to meet the complex demands of everyday life and work in the emerging knowledge-based economy" (go here for that column).

potatohead.jpg Clearly we should not be too hard on the Shadow Treasurer, Joe Hockey, whose office had to apologise earlier this month for putting out a nonsensical press release based on his wrong reading of an economics graph.

The term "the lucky country" was coined in the 1960s by the writer Donald Horne, and it wasn't a compliment. He meant that through sheer dumb luck, Australians had stumbled onto resources that allowed us to prosper among world economies, and we'd been coasting ever since. Here's his entire quote: "Australia is a lucky country, run by second-rate people who share its luck."

Horne said later: "I had in mind in particular the lack of innovation in Australian manufacturing and some other forms of Australian business, banking for example. In these, as a colonial carry over, Australia showed less enterprise than almost any other prosperous industrial society."

In the 1990s, Horne joined a campaign to raise education standards, aiming to make us a "clever country" with the skills to thrive without such props as iron ore and coal. He said: "I think we should realise that the lucky country provides a descriptive phrase, condemning Australia for what it was, whereas the clever country is a pre-scriptive phrase, suggesting to Australia what it might become."

Are we there yet? The latest Social Trends report from the Bureau of Stats has good news about young Australians. Here are the results of the latest testing on 8,000 students in what is called TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study):

"Australian students performed well in 2007 when compared with other participating countries, but were outperformed by England, the United States and most of the Asian countries, especially Singapore and Chinese Taipei. Australian students achieved an international ranking of 14th (out of 49) for Years 4 and 8 maths and 13th for Years 4 and 8 science." In science, our kids were equal to students in Germany, Italy, Lithuania and Sweden, which doesn't sound too bad at all (go here for the details).

But in the same Social Trends report, the bureau reveals the results of another test called ALLS (Adult Literacy and Life Skills), conducted on 9,000 people aged 15-74: "The ability to access and use health information is a fundamental skill which allows people to make informed decisions and helps them to maintain basic health ... Skill level 3 is regarded as the minimum required to allow individuals to meet the complex demands of everyday life. In 2006, 41 per cent of adults were assessed as having adequate or better health literacy skills, scoring at level 3 or above. At this level, people could generally perform tasks such as combining information in text and a graph to correctly assess the safety of a product." (Go here for the details.)

Only 41 per cent have "adequate" literacy? So if Joe Hockey had been able to understand that graph, he'd have been unAustralian.

Go to Comments to discuss whether Australians are as dumb as the data suggests.

David Dale is the author of Who We Are -- A snapshot of Australia today (Allen and Unwin). For daily updates on Australian attitudes, bookmark http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare.

COMMENTS

What a sad society we live in when another piece of movie making garbage, Transformers II is marketed to our unsuspecting Australian youth. Our kids are sucked in by marketing worth millions of dollars paid by Hollywood. I am constantly pleading with my children (20, 19 & 15) not to spend your hard earned cash on trivial, time wasting Hollywood films produced by morally desperate corporations who continually live to be right and famous. Constantly spewing out different attractive girls like Megan, who obviously is not too academically bright, exploiting her body to be rich and famous. Shilo Le Boof who must have had a heavy night with a bunch of mates and chosen a girly name to be different and famous.
I also blame the 'movie reviewers' in Australian media who are not truthful in their reviews and essentially lie to the public to promote Hollywood garbage. Essentially they are part of the business and to keep mates with some of the smutty comedic actors sell out our Australian culture and kids.
I believe Australia should have the confidence to believe in our actors and movies and start to challenge the Hollywood garbage that is playing in our cinema's and replace them with morally healthy movies that create peace instead of these loud, destructive movies. The Australian youth need more choice and are better than these movies.

Tribal Mind remarks: The Aiustralian critics were very negative about T2. Were they untruthful then?

  • by Jane Davies on July 12, 2009 at 10:41 AM

Lets have everything written in terms of 'standard drinks', that might help. Also, RE: Hollywood blockbusters, those movies are global events developed with global appeal in mind. There's more to blockbusters than people naturally assume.

  • by canoli on July 12, 2009 at 09:36 PM

POST A COMMENT

Security code image.