Who We Are

Advertisement

The Tribal Mind: The diary of all the Joneses

To learn what makes Australians sick, go to Who We Are.
by David Dale
Picture this column slapping its forehead and saying "D'oh". Last week we were talkin' 'bout how generations generate generalisations (Baby Boomers are selfish, GenXers are flighty,The iGen are celebrity-obsessed, etc), and blow me down if we didn't manage to leave out a whole age group. And not just any old age group, but the most important age group of all, at least in its own mind, because it contains every current political leader in the English speaking world.

We failed to mention Generation Jones (or, as we should call it in this country, Generation Rudbull). Numerous readers were quick to fill our generation gap (go here to read the column and the comments).

abba.jpg Background: You're familiar with the concept of "keeping up with the Joneses" - what we're all supposedly trying to do in this competitive consumerist culture. You may be less familiar with a piece of American jargon in which the noun is turned into a verb that means craving: "I'm jonesing for a drink" or "She's jonesing to see the new Star Trek movie".

From these usages comes a label for people born between 1955 and 1964 - a group which used to be lumped in with the Baby Boomers until they started their own independence movement.

Since music is essential in defining the spirit of a generation, it's important to note that while the Boomers had their first sexual experiences to the sound of The Rolling Stones, The Beatles, and Jimi Hendrix, the Joneses did it to Abba, Wings and Elton John. That alone is enough to establish their mindset as different from their older siblings.

gillard.jpgThe inventer of the term, American social analyst Jonathan Pontell, writes: "Generations arise from shared formative experiences, not head counts, and the two groups evolved with dramatic differences ... While the Boomers were out changing the world, Jonesers were still school kids -- wide-eyed, not tie-dyed. That intense love-peace-change-the-world zeitgeist stirred our impressionable hearts. We yearned to express our own voice ... Obama has The Jones. So do many of today's Western leaders. More than a quarter of all adults in many NATO and EU countries are Jonesers.

flares.jpg "Our size, age and influence across the board make us an irresistible force. Our non-ideological pragmatism allows us to resolve intra-Boomer skirmishes and to bridge that volatile Boomer-GenXer divide. We can lead. For Boomers, the legacy of the 1960s is ideology, but for Jonesers it is idealism." (Go here to read more of Pontell.)

Clearly, this is the master race, bestriding other generations like a colossus. We should be delighted that all the important decisions in this country - and all the arguments against those decisions -- are made by such demi-gods.

Last week this column analysed how the different generations watch television, finding that Gen X seemed obsessed with competitive dieting and cooking (The Biggest Loser and Masterchef) while Boomers were sentimental homebodies (A Lion Called Christian, Find My Family and Better Homes and Gardens).

These revelations caused some readers to lament that every group except The Pioneers (born before 1946 and fans of the Treasurer's budget speech) were lovers of "superficial drivel" and "prole-feed". Now that we've heard about the Joneses, we know they would not be so easily satisfied.

We asked our boffins to slice even more finely into the OzTAM audience data for April-May and examine the tastes of viewers aged between 45 and 54. This was the result ...

What Generation Rudbull watches: Underbelly; The Biggest Loser; Thank God You're Here; The Logie Awards; Seven News; NCIS; Talkin' 'Bout Your Generation; Australia's Got Talent.

The Joneses are much less interested than the boomers in Better Homes and Gardens, Find My Family, and Midsomer Murders. They are much less interested than Gen X in So You Think You Can Dance Australia and Bondi Rescue.

Over to you for interpretation. Go to comments to tell us if Generation Rudbull deserves the crown.

David Dale is the author of Who We Are -- A snapshot of Australia today (Allen and Unwin). For daily updates on Australian attitudes, bookmark http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare.

COMMENTS

OK, so I am an old curmudgeon who tells opinion pollsters and TV ratings agencies to get lost and is proud to have made it onto the "Do not visit" lists of the Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses but is anybody else out there fed up with being pigeonholed into idiotic age groupings for the purposes of advertising curs? Born in 1947, I have read the ramblings of Miranda Devine and the late Paddy McGuinness about "baby boomers" without recognising any of my life experiences, only the fantasy land of American television "sitcoms" (i.e., comedies without humour.) Go "Jones" or as you put it "Rudbull" those eight to seventeen younger than myself, I do not care as I never felt I had anything in common with them anyway. It is just another moronic heading for journos to beat people up with.

  • by John Pollock on May 30, 2009 at 06:31 AM

'the Joneses did it to Abba, Wings and Elton John. That alone is enough to establish their mindset as different from their older siblings.' Finally, someone who really understands the true foundations of my generation! Thanks TM.

  • by rufus on May 30, 2009 at 09:02 AM

I'm feeling very out of place with the lists of preferred viewing on TV. Born in '62 makes me a "Joneses/Boomer" but, there was only one show listed that I watch regularly (NCIS). Even with last week's lists, I only matched with a few & they were spread across all "demographics". I don't know how people are chosen to represent the "typical viewer" but, I've never matched their viewing habits. What does that say about me?

  • by Luke on May 30, 2009 at 10:25 AM

Sex to "ABBA, Wings and Elton John"?!!
Yikes!! No wonder my generation is so screwed!
Wild Cherry, Manfred Mann's Earth Band, AC/DC, Rose Tattoo... were more what I remember as fornication lubricators. Stuff that was "funk laden" AND HARD.
Even the girls liked it that way back then... Funk laden and hard - not mayonnaise coated and limp wristed.
"Rudbull" eh? A contracted play upon Rudd and Bull I take it... Shouldn't the term be more correctly preceded by a capital C, so that the final form (with a little modification) would be: Crud-n-Bull...
In the revised form I've suggested, the term summarizes the sort of entertainment, pronouncements regarding taste, assumptions, generalisations and mind numbing drivel that is shovelled out in an effort to make money by folks who fit any age group that likes to big note itself.

  • by Steve C on May 30, 2009 at 11:20 AM

* by Luke on May 30, 2009 at 10:25 AM
-------------------------------------
It say that there's bound to be some legislation passed to prevent any future occurrences of such aberrant behaviour...
"One thing though - I can cope with being called Generation Jones, but please, not Rudbull. Gen Jones works for me.
* by wombat on May 31, 2009 at 09:21 AM"
----------------------------------
Doesn't "Rudbull" have enough similarity to "Redbull" though?
The Generation that "gives you wings" even if they prove to be like most political promises - empty and ultimately crappy...
Ahh... Now I see why younger generations think our generation stinks!

  • by Steve C on May 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM

Round about now ought to be that generation or sub-generation's moment in the sun.
Oddly enough, I don't feel it myself....

  • by marcellous on May 30, 2009 at 08:26 PM

Yes, Yes, Yes. Thank you David. All my life (born 1957) I have not felt part of the "boomer" generation. It was always like hearing about a great party and arriving a day late. Too young for "the summer of love" et al. We do deserve our own history. We are a generation that was positioned to take advantage of Gough's free university revolution. To me it is no surprise that this group is leading many sections of society (I head a health NGO).
One thing though - I can cope with being called Generation Jones, but please, not Rudbull. Gen Jones works for me.

  • by wombat on May 31, 2009 at 09:21 AM

Yawn. So, you've finally caught up, David? Generation Jones has been around forever - it used to be called the Lost Generation (and a lot narrower; 1960-64), sandwiched in between the Boomers and Gen X. Hadn't realised someone had named it (and no doubt thereby claimed it).
Yeah, generically speaking, we're different from the Boomers and X'ers, but like all of these clever labels, it's a matter of degree. People are about as likely to recognise themselves in them as they are to recognise themselves in the description of their star sign - and for much the same reasons.
In the end, the generation wars aren't about social analysis, they are about shifting product.

  • by Godot on May 31, 2009 at 12:58 PM

55-64? I'm not sure they have the range right. For a long time baby-boomers ended in 1961 and Gen X started in 66. So if you were part of the "Forgotten Generation" (62-65) like me (1963) then it's all a bit laughable.
But pragmatic we are - we saw what happenned to our older siblings, and we worked hard, went to Uni (it was free!) and got a mortgage as soon as we could.
And now, someone notices that we have money, and that we have leaders. Woo Hoo!
And the ratings breakdown includes all the shows I watch (and a few I don't). As most are on the ABC, it's time for the advertisers to figure out what *I* like, otherwise I'll just keep saving money (and spending it at the ABC shop)...

  • by Sandy on May 31, 2009 at 03:39 PM

I believe Wendy Harmer described our generation years ago as the Dag generation, as we were responsible for making Abba, Sherbert and the Bay City Rollers famous; all things the Boomers seemed to detest. We grew up with Astro Boy, Gilligan and the Flying Nun and in Australia Adventure Island, Owly School the original Cartoon Corner with Skeeter and the Super Flying Fun Show. We were there for the original Hey Hey it's Saturday! and read "Spunky" while our older sibling read Rolling Stone. Perhaps we deserve to be called the Dag generation. I'd prefer that than to hitch our star to a politician, no matter what my personal political proclivities may be.

  • by Beatie on May 31, 2009 at 03:41 PM

About time the lost generation is finally recognised as a demographic. We were too young to see the Beatles or Rolling Stones live, enjoyed ABBA the first time round, thought flairs and platform shoes were cool, benefitted from free university and missed the wars.
For too long we have been lumped with the baby boomers who will get defined benefit superannuation, while we pay for the politicians changing the rules.
The boomers are sliding into retirement while the Joneses are at the peak of influence.
Well done on identifying a demographic identified by Wendy Harmer many years ago.

  • by Peter Barnes on June 01, 2009 at 07:09 AM

I have the sense that Generation Jones is going to start getting major attention in Australia like its been getting in the U.S. Both Rudd and Obama are GenJonesers.
Google Generation Jones, and you�ll see it�s gotten a ton of media attention in the States, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, etc.) now specifically use this term. In fact, The Associated Press' annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009.
It is important to distinguish between the post-WWII demographic boom in births vs. the cultural generations born during that era. Generations are a function of the common formative experiences of its members, not the fertility rates of its parents. Many experts now believe it breaks down this way:
DEMOGRAPHIC boom in babies: 1946-1964
Baby Boom GENERATION: 1942-1953
Generation Jones: 1954-1965
Generation X: 1966-1978
Here is an op-ed in the biggest U.S. newspaper--USA TODAY--about GenJones as the new generation of leadership:
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090127/column27_st.art.htm
Here's a page with a good overview of recent media interest in GenJones:
http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html
And here's a five minute video featuring dozens of America's top political commentators discussing the importance of Generation Jones:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk

  • by TrendSpotting on June 04, 2009 at 03:17 AM

Generation Jones is ahistorical, atheoretical, and simply a conceptualization of a phenomenon that separates EVERY generation from each other. A "Gen Jones" separated the GI Gen from the Lost Generation, the Lost Generation from the Boomers, and so forth. This occurs because generations are comprised of individuals who each have their own unique cultural and historical experiences, and as time progresses, some lean towards one experience/culture, while others lean the other way.
Scholars do not all collectively follow Pontell, and in every article on Generations, the same two or three nerds copy and paste the same list of "generations" and attempt to pass it off as fact. Not all X'ers and Boomers subscribe to this highly constructed "generation" of only 10 years.
Those who repeat the Gen Jones mantra do so, I believe, because they wish to accept only those generational symbols that reflect on them positively while rejecting those that reflect on them negatively. "I'm not a ideal, naive Boomer or a cynical X'er," says the so-called "Gen Joneser." (Well, good for you!)
It's a marginal idea with very little theoretical grounding or support. Pontell needs to read a little more Raymond Williams.

  • by X'er on June 05, 2009 at 03:07 PM

I don't think it was me who originally called my tribe as "the generation that taste forgot" - but I have always loved that description. We were the first generation to suck up mass marketing - pet rocks, anyone?
It's true that we were never Boomers - we were too young for the Rolling Stones, Iggy Pop and only got the last cartoon days of the Beatles. The "Magical Mystery Tour" had become the "Patrtidge Family Bus" by the time we Jonesers came along. I loved the Monkees,smiley badges ( without the LSD), I had a Mao Tse Tung watch and a Che Guevara t-towel!
We may be thought to be shallow , but I like to think we GenJonsers laughed the most - the Comic Strip,Not the Nine O'Clock News, The Big Gig, Comedy Company, Fast Forward etc. We took the mickey ( Dolenz) out of the boomers who were our big brothers and sisters and, i like to think, have never become cynical or disillusioned. We still see the funny side of life, I reckon. We remain flexible and endlessly amused as we all hit the 50's. And, more importantly, as blessed children of peace time before herpes, aids or global warming, remain optomistic and involved. I hope we stay that way.Here's to us- although we are most likely to have a laugh at the idea that anyone can classify attitudes by the calendar.

  • by wendy harmer on September 03, 2009 at 07:43 PM

POST A COMMENT

Security code image.