Advertisement
To learn how Big Brother made Australia smarter, go to Who We Are
by David Dale
The revelation that The Dark Knight sold $2.3 million worth of tickets on its first day in Australian cinemas (more than most movies sell in a week) reminds me of this column's promise to do a reality check on a foolish prediction made here last month. When Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull earned $12.3 million in its first week, I said it would end up selling far fewer tickets than its predecessor, Raiders of the Lost Ark, despite the conventional wisdom that blockbusters always total about three times their first week's takings.
My reasoning: IJ4 does not satisfy the requirements of the archetypal Hero's Journey (explained here); has a dud McGuffin (the alien football is no match for the Ark of the Covenant or The Holy Grail -- explained here); has a cliche climax (UFOs again!); and fails to give its villain a satisfying sendoff (Our Cate's demise is a pale imitation of the Nazi head melt in IJ1, despite leaps in special effects since 1981).
To be as successful as the original, IJ4 needed to earn $33 million. In fact, it will leave Australian cinemas with $29.5 million. That suggests that it did not generate enthusiastic word-of-mouth. If it had the emotional resonance of IJ1 and IJ3, it would have picked up repeat business during the school holidays, but its core audience (teenage boys of all ages) were easily distracted by such other heroes as John Hancock, Maxwell Smart, Prince Caspian, Zohan Dvir, Po Panda and, most recently, Bruce Wayne.
Here's the box office chart for the year up to last Thursday: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull $29m; Sex and The City $26m; I Am Legend $23m; Kung Fu Panda $23m (in three weeks); Iron Man $20m; Alvin and the Chipmunks $18m; 27 Dresses $16m; Hancock $16m (in two weeks); Narnia: Prince Caspian $14m; Get Smart $14m (in three weeks); Dr Suess Horton Hears a Who $12m; American Gangster $12m; Juno $12m; You Don't Mess With The Zohan $11m; Mamma Mia $8m (in one week).
The Dark Knight has all the qualities IJ4 lacked: depth, complexity, imagination, characterisation, and a literate script. The special effects will draw the teens, and grownups will be curious about Heath Ledger's performance and intrigued by the examination of moral responsibility in civilised societies.
TDK will certainly gross more than the $16 million made by its predecessor, Batman Begins, in 2005. But will it sell more tickets than Batman, the 1989 movie in which Michael Keaton was the dark knight and Jack Nicholson was The Joker? That made $13.8m, which would be $23m at today's ticket prices.
Having had a rare success with the prediction about IJ4, this column should quit while its ahead, but I'm going to go again: TDK won't be the biggest moneymaker of this year (that will be Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince) or even the second biggest (IJ4) or the third biggest (Sex and the city or Kung Fu Panda).
It deserves to beat those blockbusters, but it won't, because it's too thoughtful. I'd like to be proved wrong, because that will mean moviegoers prefer a movie that respects their intelligence. Lets revisit this topic in eight weeks, and meantime, you can offer your predictions by going to Comments
David Dale is the author of Who We Are -- A snapshot of Australia today (Allen and Unwin). To discuss Australian attitudes, go to http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare.
JEQP - think yourself lucky, having a ten year old girl the only movies I have seen on that list in IJ4, Alvin & The Chipmunks & Horton Hears a Who, I am pretty sure The Dark Knight is off the menu unless I can sneak out myself!
Batman in general has alway done well in box office terms, hell even the tragic Schumacker Batman & Robin did well financialy. People probably treated Batman Begins with contempt given the fiasco of the movie prior, add superb reviews an people will flock to the cinema. What does let this film down will be the "Kid Element" with flicks like Kung Fu Panda and practicaly anything animated (They could animate grass growing and kids would drag parents to the cinema) doing well. Batman will do well for its genre and target audience but it wont be the higest grossing film of the year and even if it was, Grass Growing would probably top it later in the year at a cinema near you.
I beg to differ TM - I reckon The Dark Knight will eclipse the original Batman movie and IJ4 at least, and maybe even Kung Fu Panda et al. The hype surrounding The Dark Knight is (almost deservedly) immense across all demographics so I'm betting the only competition it'll get for top spot in 2008 will be Harry Potter.
TDK will beat all of the films you mention except for Harry Potter, and even that it has a shot at.
The reviews are driving casual Bat-fans (ie. even those who skipped out on Batman Begins) to cinemas in droves, and the likelihood of repeat viewings seems high given the enthusiasm of those who have seen it.
Kung Fu Panda will leap frog IJ4 and S&TC - with an outside chance of finishing ahead of TDK.
I think The Dark Knight will definitely make more than IJ4. The way it is tracking it could end up with 35 - 40 mill or even higher. Deservedly so too, I hated Batman Begins, but The Dark Knight is a movie I could go back and watch a second, even third time.
When posting comments on blogs you agree to abide by our terms and conditions.
Comments that are offensive, defamatory, unsuitable or that breach any aspects of the terms will be deleted.
Advertisement
| member centre | network map | mobile | advertise with us | place a classified ad |
I have to agree with your descriptions of the movies... I'm a big fan of Indiana Jones (and high adventure is my favourite genre) but the fourth one had a lot of issues. The biggest of which is that it changed the mythology giving the impression that Jones had gone senile and joined a new-age alien worshiping cult. Another issue was the sidekick, who seemed aimed mainly at ensuring the continuation of the series after Ford. It was a good movie, with a lot of action and special effects and all else that is required, but it didn't seem like an Indiana Jones movie.
The Dark Knight was the best Batman movie I've seen -- although that's subjective, of course. This interpretation of Batman is about as far as you can get from the 70's camp version without him going renegade. Nicholson also played a good Joker, but more comedic, more...slapstick. Ledger played a good psychopath. I don't think this one will be as "successful" as the Nicholson one, because it is inherently less commercial. But it should be talked about for longer, in the same way that the Dark Knight comics are still one of the most talked about Batman comics.