Who We Are

Advertisement

The Tribal Mind: Television becomes an antiques roadshow

by David Dale
What a sweet revenge for the over 55s. Once spurned and ignored by the commercial stations -- "Let them watch the ABC," was the attitude -- they have now become the powerbrokers. Their tastes will determine which network wins this year and gets the most advertising in 2009.

Not long ago Channel Ten used to put out press releases boasting how certain programs were "shedding" older viewers, while Nine and Seven proudly declared their target audience to be viewers aged 25-54. There's none of that talk now.

The oldies are golden, and not just because there are more of them. It's also because they're the first ones back into their cocoons as uncertainty grows about the economy (see last week's column). And once they've pulled up the drawbridge, the over-55s are more likely to watch the box than the under 40s, who have other distractions.

youngdannii.jpg For a vision of the future of Australian television, look at the favourite shows of each age group last week. In particular, compare the audience totals across the mainland capitals ...

Shows most watched by viewers over 55: Seven news 849,000 viewers in this age group; ABC news 804,000; Wild China (ABC) 727, 000; Today Tonight (7) 701,000; Sea Patrol (7) 699,000; Silent Witness (ABC) 697,000; Australia's Got Talent (7) 692,000; Border Security repeat (7) 652,000; The Einstein Factor (ABC) 649,000; Nine news 642,000; CSI (9) 633,000; Australian Story (ABC) 633,000; Better Homes and Gardens (7) 629,000; Domestic Blitz (9) 617,000.

Shows most watched by viewers aged 16-39: The Simpsons (10) 562,000 viewers in this age group; Grey's Anatomy (7) 555,000; NCIS (10) 548,000; Desperate Housewives (7) 533,000; 60 Minutes (9) 487,000; My Name is Earl (7) 486,000; The New Futurama (10) 483,000; How I Met Your Mother (7) 479,000; Rove (10) 465,000; Good News Week (10) 457,000; Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares (9) 455,000; The Gruen Transfer (ABC) 455,000; Brothers and Sisters (7) 450,000.

bluemccune.jpg You can see why the oldies are so much more attractive to the networks as a target audience than the groovers. Between 6pm and 10.30pm each night, an average of 1.821 million viewers over 55 watch television (up 3.5 per cent on last year), compared with an average of 1.397 million viewers aged 16 to 39 (down 1 per cent on last year).

Clearly there's not much common ground between the age groups. Best to target the niche with the numbers, so Nine and Seven will need to "skew older" if they are to win the year. Expect comfy crime shows set in English villages; quirky quiz shows hosted by former ABC personalities; deserving documentaries about Asian animals and adventurous Australians; and gardening guides filmed in the beautiful backyards of Lisa McCune and Dannii Minogue, who are the current queens of the senior screen (one remembered from Blue Heelers, the other from Young Talent Time).

The only hope for diversity lies with the niche we haven't dissected yet -- viewers aged 25-54. They'll be next Monday's topic.

Go to Comments to tell us what you think of the geriatrics' dominance of the box.

David Dale is the author of Who We Are -- A snapshot of Australia today (Allen and Unwin). To discuss Australian attitudes, go to http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare.

COMMENTS

What it proves...the youth audience is leaving free-to-air in big numbers. I have watched it sometimes and I think...these people have no idea what young people in 2008 are like.

  • by HooHoo on June 22, 2008 at 03:09 PM

At 64 I am not a great TV watcher ( preferring reruns of Dr Who) but am dismayed by a seemingly lack of outcryagainst the current BBrother. Maybe reported low ratings are the appropriate response,BUT, when has it become the norm to treat people with such disrespect? I doubt the inmates have the resilience to deal with the consequences of this public manipulation and humiliation. As in Japan, is this becoming the norm on TV?
Thank you.

  • by Jan on June 23, 2008 at 10:00 AM

Phillip Nietsche might be able to help.

  • by darren on June 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM

While definitely on the wrong side of 55 I dont see this demographic as uniformly homogeneous I watch shows from both your over 55's and 16-39's sets. And what about Top Gear, is that a show that is only available to 25-54's.
If it is witty, well made, intersting, is not a vehicle for pushing product it gets a gig at my place

  • by geezer on June 23, 2008 at 12:18 PM

Well I,m 61 and apart from NRL on Sunday arvo here in Perth, I don't watch FTA TV at all.
It has to be the greatest load of rubbish ever foisted on people,and why the Federal Government bends over backward to protect the people running it from competition I,m buggered if I know.
That said why do we pay so much for pay,I,m not to sure but I think OZ has among the highest charges in the worls for PayTV and broadband internet from what friends overseas have told me.
Is this correct or am I wrong,I would like to know?

  • by john Ryan on June 23, 2008 at 02:01 PM

The networks have no choice than to to start chasing the younger audiences, that's where the advertising bucks are, and that's what determines the share price.

  • by Marcus on June 25, 2008 at 05:45 PM

The networks are already run by people with dementia, so the audiences are hardly surprising.

  • by Mike on June 27, 2008 at 06:25 PM

Marcus is right the networks will always go after the younger demos as that's what the advertisers want. Good news for 9 & 10 bad news for 7 as the over 55s is the only area in which it's improved this year. The over 55 are good for overall figures but it's the 18-49 that matter when it comes to the almighty dollar.

  • by Ben on June 28, 2008 at 05:17 PM

No surprise, the young are too busy using their computers to download ad-free in real time, or they are you-tubing & facebooking. The middle age bracket are too busy working mortgage paying overtime or second jobs to watch TV. The over 55 got into the estate market before it got crazy so they can rest nice & comfy and relax for a night in front of the box.

  • by Kate on June 29, 2008 at 12:42 AM

Dale, your 'over-55' generalisation is analystically useless, out-of-touch, and plainly annoying for someone who is almost in that age bracket. You must be that age, why not write something that makes sense to us, instead of denegrating the over-50s, while stating that the 'Home & Away" kids are the relevant target audience. Your observations seem somewhat skewed.

Tribal Mind replies: Reporting on how the TV networks see their audiences does not mean "denegrating" anybody.

  • by bandbloke on June 29, 2008 at 06:29 AM

Well I'm 40 and the only tv I watch is Silent Witness, but even that's drivel now. Other than that Spooks, but I've seen them already because the ABC is about 2 years behind and I'm not waiting that long for aunty to catch up. Other than Silent Witness I haven't watched any TV since Easter. But I always read your column David, it fascinates me to find out what people supposedly watch when I don't watch or listen to any of it, and nor does anyone I know.

  • by Rudy on June 29, 2008 at 11:13 PM

POST A COMMENT

Security code image.