Advertisement
To find out if you are suitable to be an Australian citizen, go to Who We Are
For daily updates on Australian attitudes, bookmark http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare.
by David Dale
On my first day as editor of The Bulletin, in February 1988, I was taken to lunch at Mario's restaurant in East Sydney by the then managing director of Kerry Packer's empire, Trevor Kennedy.
I'd just spent six weeks in New York researching trends in the magazine industry, and I outlined a transformation plan that included a physical redesign, new sections on architecture, entertainment, technology and food, and an irreverent approach that would take the magazine back to its larrikin roots. I used the phrase "a tone of benign scepticism" a lot.
"Yeah, yeah, that's all fine," Kennedy said, "but there's only one thing you need to save this magazine." Goodness, I thought, my first day on the job and already I'm getting the magic formula from the man who'd taken The Bulletin to its peak of political influence in the 1970s.
"What's that?" I asked. "F---ing good stories," Kennedy replied.
I argued with him then, and I argued with Kerry Packer when I met him a week later, that magazines were no longer about breaking stories.
That function was being performed very well by daily papers and by TV stations. What a magazine could do was break ideas, attitudes, and new ways of understanding society, and present them in an individual voice that would delight more readers than it would offend. That could be the point of difference that might attract readers under the age of 50.
I'm not sure that Kennedy ever agreed with me and I'm quite sure Packer never agreed with me. Two years and one month later, Packer fired me for publishing a cover story called "The Great Australian Balance Sheet - Our human assets and liabilities" (an updating of an earlier cover called "The 100 Most Appalling People in Australia").
Apparently at least one of the human liabilities was close enough to Packer to persuade him that this irreverence was not the best way forward for his venerable weekly.
When I left, the circulation was 112,000 a week. These days, as the mag takes its terminal breath, circulation stands at 60,000 a week.
It's sad that a piece of Australian history will disappear from our newsstands, but it's not surprising. If not for Packer's nostalgia, it would have gone ten years ago. Like John Howard, The Bulletin outstayed its welcome.
I was just one of a series of band-aids applied to the magazine over the past two decades, each trying a different desperate measure to avert the inevitable.
Better journalists than I have edited The Bulletin before and since my period, but none has been able to overcome the fundamental problem -- there is no role in a multimedia society for a weekly publication that simply reports and analyses news.
Packer never recognised that. He kept the magazine going against the advice of his money managers. He never lost hope that it could still exert influence.
One afternoon in 1989, he ranted at me for an hour about the need for a cover story that would stop the federal government from embracing free trade, because the economy would not survive the removal of protectionist barriers.
I said that would make a discussion for the business pages, but as a cover story it would bore our target audience and destroy all the circulation gains we'd been making recently. He didn't care.
The Bulletin has gone and with it, the age of media proprietors who will allow eccentricity to override expediency. That's the really sad part.
David Dale is the author of Who We Are -- A snapshot of Australia today (Allen and Unwin). His latest book is Soffritto -- A delicious Ligurian memoir. For daily updates on Australian attitudes and behaviour, go to Who we are.
Shoopie, I guess the thing that people that are interested in what news The Bulletin has to offer can find that sort of information online. The immediacy of news these days means that by the time a monthly mag comes old the news can be stale.
And you're right - we live in a celebrity hungry culture. A culture that hails yellow sunglass wearing dimwits as heroes. A culture that idolizes reality. Real time.
good read
DD observes: Not after this week.
"there is no role in a multimedia society for a weekly publication that simply reports and analyses news"
What like the Economist? It has managed to still be compelling in this multimedia age because it contains, for the most part, quality analyses that are not easy to find the oceans of free content online.
But the Economist isn't an Australian publication which begs the question - is the dearth of quality analysis in our media due to a lack of talent, condescending management choices or is there simply not enough of a market for it in this country?
I don't believe "We're losing our appetite for scandal". I think people now prefer to visit website's such as Perezhilton.com and TMZ.com which are updated within minutes of the latest 'scandal' occurring.
As someone who has been closely involved with Asia, I always felt The Bulletin was not with it on Asia or Australian-Asian issues. At a time when Australia's economy had become mainly reliant on Asia and Asia was becoming the main overseas destination for Australians, Asia rarely appeared in The Bulletin's pages. The only article that comes to mind is the infamous "deputy sheriff" article, which demonstrated the lack of knowledge of the issues on the part of the reporter concerned, and sub-editors. If overseas countries featured, there was a strange and anachronistic focus on the UK, with the US running in second place. I think this cultural black spot reflected Packer's own cultural horizons.
When posting comments on blogs you agree to abide by our terms and conditions.
Comments that are offensive, defamatory, unsuitable or that breach any aspects of the terms will be deleted.
Advertisement
| member centre | network map | mobile | advertise with us | place a classified ad |
You only have to look at the mag covers in the newstands today to see where The Bulletin went wrong! No Britney, no Lindsay, no Paris!!!