Who We Are

Advertisement

Split infinities

by David Dale
As you know, there are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people and those who don't. If you are in the first category, you'll want to know about a new dichotomy just thrown up by research: Innies (people who, as babies, rode in a pram or stroller that had them facing the parent) and Outies (people who rode in a stroller that faced the destination ahead).

According to Britain's National Literacy Trust (here), pram position can have a profound effect on how children learn to communicate and come to deal with the people and things around them.

Babies facing inwards see and hear the person talking to them. Babies facing outwards see the passing parade and may hear a disembodied voice. So two different approaches to life are formed.

It is reasonable to speculate that Innies grow up to be teachers, writers, marketers, psychologists, restaurateurs, lawyers and portrait painters, while Outies grow up to be pilots, explorers, architects, athletes, taxi drivers, programmers and house painters.

This discovery lets us expand a list developed by the managing editor of Atlantic Monthly magazine, Cullen Murphy. In an oft-quoted article called "The Power of Two", he said dividing humanity into "dyads" provides a useful tool for classifying behaviour. One of his favourite divisions is "There are two kinds of people in the world: Italians and those who wish they were". He also enjoys the Ogden Nash verse: "There are two kinds of people who blow through life like a breeze. And one of them is gossipers and the other kind is gossipees."

In this country we're familiar with such divisions as conservative vs progressive, gay vs straight and republican vs monarchist, but Murphy offers almost infinite refinements. He slices people thus:

Dog (ie active, needy) vs Cat (ie calm, self-contained)
Saver vs Tosser
Cook vs Cleaner-upper
Prickly vs Gooey
Manual vs Automatic
Whitebread vs Wholemeal
Deciduous vs Evergreen
Sun vs Planet

To which we may now add Innie vs Outie. Murphy calculates that a mere 20 dichotomies yield more than a million possible combinations, but worries what would happen if someone with all the qualities in column A met someone with all the qualities in column B. He fears that "as with the theorised collision of matter and anti-matter, the universe as we know it would instantly cease to exist." Or perhaps it led to the formation of the Australian Democrats.

Anyway, let's see how the system might work. We could describe Australia's best liked woman, Magda Szubanski, as gooey, dog, wholemeal, automatic, innie, planet and deciduous -- at least as revealed by the characters she plays. Australia's best liked man, Andrew Denton, is prickly, cat, manual, cook, sun, evergreen, and innie.

George Bush is dog, gooey, tosser, automatic, whitebread, decidous, planet and outie. John Howard is prickly, cat, outie, cook and whitebread. Peter Costello is also whitebread, but gooey, dog, innie, cleaner and planet.

Are there better ways to slice humanity, and how would you classify some of this country's public figures?

David Dale is the author of Who We Are -- A snapshot of Australia today (Allen and Unwin). His latest book is Soffritto -- A delicious Ligurian memoir. To join a daily discussion of Australian attitudes, go to http://blogs.sunherald.com.au/whoweare.

COMMENTS

The ultimate classification:

"There are 10 types of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't."

http://bash.org/?25464

  • by Andrew Lau on January 10, 2006 at 02:59 AM

No, David.
The world is divided into 10 people: those who understand binary and those who don't.
For the record, I was an outie. That was the norm in the late 50s/early 60s.
And we were glad of it.

  • by Margaret Morgan on January 10, 2006 at 03:20 AM

I've noticed two other differences;
Those that walk up escalators and those that stand to the left, and those that run for flashing red walk signals and those that wait.

  • by Paul T on January 10, 2006 at 08:44 AM

I transported my kids around in a pram with a reversible handle, so they spent some time facing in and some time facing out. I guess they'll either become well balanced adults, or schizophrenics. III

  • by III on January 10, 2006 at 08:55 AM

I disagree with Paul's excalator theory. There is most definitely a third type of person in this case. Those who frustrate the other two kinds by standing still on the right side!

  • by Juliet Harrison on January 10, 2006 at 09:05 AM

There are three types of people in this world. Those who can count, and those who can't.

  • by Brendan on January 10, 2006 at 09:10 AM

Don't you think this is a rather simplistic view of life and humanity? What a bout the third type, those how couldn't care less about dualities.

  • by Third Type on January 10, 2006 at 09:43 AM

To add some toilet talk to the debate: there are also the scrunchers and the folders [of toilet paper].

  • by Barry on January 10, 2006 at 09:59 AM

In Japan if you stand on the right hand side of an escalator people who want to walk past simply push you to the left as that is the designated standing area. I dont know if thats good or bad but it sure saves time.

  • by Me on January 10, 2006 at 10:34 AM

Inspired by Tori Amos' 'Cornflake Girl,' i'm going for: Cornflake vs. Raisin.

Cornflakes are everywhere, but when you find a raisin in your mouth, your world gets infinitely better.

Cornflake are automatic, whitebread tossers whereas sultanas are manual, wholemeal savers.

  • by justine on January 10, 2006 at 10:45 AM

There are generally two types of people, male and female.

tj

  • by Terence John Clifford on January 10, 2006 at 11:23 AM

Surely Holden people versus Ford people! At least in my day, before all these new fangled Japanese cars, and before anyone could afford european cars, there were two very distinct tribes. Even if you never owned one or the other you were one or the other, especially when the Hardie Ferodo (that's the Bathurst 500 for you youngsters) rolled round.

  • by John A on January 10, 2006 at 11:26 AM

I'm told there are 2 types:
CCs or Doritos.
Not being a corn chip eater, I'm not sure where that leaves me.

  • by jj smith on January 10, 2006 at 12:48 PM

There are two kinds of people, those who finish what they start and so on.

  • by Byrne on January 10, 2006 at 12:51 PM

Surely it has to be Brevilles or Jaffals...

  • by Ben on January 10, 2006 at 01:22 PM

You forgot Apple vs. Windows people.

  • by Rex on January 10, 2006 at 01:40 PM

i faced both in and out - im worried.

  • by iain on January 10, 2006 at 02:19 PM

There's me - and these's everyone else.

  • by Bart on January 10, 2006 at 03:48 PM

There are 10 types of people on Earth!

Those that understand binary...and those that don't

hehehehe

  • by Bionic on January 10, 2006 at 03:48 PM

Why is it though, Paul T, that those who run for the flashing red lights then just amble across the road making drivers waiting to turn left wait? Any thoughts?
BTW, I was an outie but am in marketing so perhaps I am an anomaly. Another question, how do you define babies carried in slings?

  • by CP on January 10, 2006 at 03:58 PM

Those that let the microwave complete the set time, and those that don't.

Those that suck malteasers, and those that crunch.

  • by aaron on January 10, 2006 at 04:15 PM

i thought that the two types of people were those who think there are two types of people and those who know better

  • by matt on January 10, 2006 at 04:32 PM

Margaret and Andrew, you stole my binary joke! I will hunt you down and hack your mainframe!!

  • by David Griffin on January 10, 2006 at 04:48 PM

And you forgot the dualities forced upon us... Dubya's is the classic there, ie Those who are with us or agin' us. The 'with' of that category could also be defined as those who shoot first and ask questions later (or never at all).

  • by James on January 11, 2006 at 03:18 AM

Those who accept homosexuality and those who dont, and which way did they face in the pram?

  • by Benn on January 11, 2006 at 08:08 AM

exellent

  • by abi on March 03, 2006 at 05:10 AM

POST A COMMENT

Security code image.