Matthew Hall

Advertisement

Football and The Plague

"All I know most surely about morality and obligations, I owe to football."

So wrote French-Algerian writer Albert Camus, famous for writing a book called The Plague and for being a somewhat reasonable goalkeeper with his university football team.

Camus never claimed that life always took the high moral ground - far from it.

I once referenced that famous Camus quote on a business card - part pretension and part advisory to some of the people who once inhabited the dark world of Australian football.

That business card always got second looks.

However, some strange events have occurred in the past months that have cynics like me scratching their heads.

Things kicked off in July with A-League officials taking an initiative, of sorts.

The Australian domestic comp followed the lead of the Scottish Premier League (see, not everything that comes from Scottish football is bad) introducing retrospective bans on players found to have deceived the referee, ie "divers".

That is, players who cheat.

Hooray for that.

Diving again hit the headlines just over a week ago when Arsenal striker Eduardo, a Brazilian who plays international football for Croatia, took a dive in a UEFA Champions League game against Scottish side Celtic.

Arsenal were awarded a penalty from which Eduardo scored and killed off any ambition Celtic had of getting back into the game.

Pretty much everyone regarded Eduardo's tumble as Hollywood quality acting.

Everyone, that is, except for the referee, Arsenal coach Arsene Wenger, and die-hard Arse fans.

But perhaps more shocking than Eduardo's act of deception was that UEFA, the governing body for football in Europe, decided to take action and impose a two-match suspension on the player.

This provoked outrage from Arsenal (and the team's fans), the club responding with a 19-page dossier in Eduardo's defence.

Perhaps it was printed using a large font.

But, so far, the ban stands (unlike the player).

On cue, Arsenal met Manchester United last weekend and Wayne Rooney "won" a penalty that put United back in the game.

Arsenal fans say Rooney dived, Rooney said he didn't and doesn't so, cough, case closed.

The moral high ground rose a few metres even higher when Chelsea was banned by FIFA from signing any players until 2011 after the club was found guilty of "illegally inducing a French youth international to sign in 2007".

That sounds like baby births gone bad but FIFA isn't joking about Chelsea's controversial acquisition of Gaël Kakuta from the youth academy of French club Lens.

To make its point. FIFA also banned Kakuta for four months and fined him €780,000, somewhere close to AUD$1 million.

Chelsea plans to appeal, of course, suggesting in a statement "the sanctions are without precedent to this level".

That's true and exactly the point.

"They stole the boy off us when he was 16," Gervais Martel, President of Lens, told The Guardian.

"He was at our club since the age of eight-and-a-half. Unfortunately, 95 times out of 100, it's the English clubs who come and help themselves."

Morality and obligations?

Perhaps, slowly, professional football is being dragged up those hills.


COMMENTS

I think you'll find most 'Arse' fans are quite happy to admit that Eduardo did indeed dive, but instead are up in arms about having their player singled out, when similarly blatant dives go unpunished every week. Especially as UEFA have now admitted they have no intention of following through with similar retrospective bans.

  • by Ben on September 06, 2009 at 08:58 AM

I think you getting carried away just a little bit, Michael.

  • by g on September 06, 2009 at 05:53 PM

Absolutely right. The sooner the better I feel.

  • by RuckusAmongus on September 06, 2009 at 07:15 PM

Spot on Ben.

Especially when the player in question nearly lost his leg 18 months ago after a horrendous tackle and can hardly be blamed for trying to get out of the way when about to be cleaned up by a goalkeeper.

I'm more than happy for UEFA/FIFA to punish divers after the event, but to start in such a random way and with apparently no intention to follow their precedent just maintains the farcical standards we have sadly come to expect from the games various governing bodies.

  • by Alan on September 07, 2009 at 05:02 AM

If making an example of Eduardo and causing some grief to the Arsenal club are the only negative outcomes of this affair, then the whole exercise will have been worthwhile. Someone at some stage was going to have to be the first player to cop it. It is only because European footballers are such over-pampered, over-paid and over-exposed cry babies that this has caused such a stir. In hindsight this ruling may well come to be seen as a landmark decision. Bravo to FIFA for having the balls to make such a rule. Diving (let's call it what it is. "Simulation" is the FIFA name for it to make it sound more benign than it really is) is the single biggest problem facing football today. If the FFA want to know why football is not taking off the way they would like in Australia, or why FIFA want to know how to crack the US market, take a look at this practice of diving. As long as Australians see it on TV they will stay away in droves. A sporting public raised on the toughest of sports (league, union, AFL) is not going to tolerate it. If you're not convinced, try defending diving to a non-football fan? You can't defend the indefensible.

  • by Luc on September 07, 2009 at 09:47 AM

Eduardo dived. That 2 match ban is ridiculous considering Eduardo did not appeal for the penalty & I sympathise with Arsenal & their fans.

Rooney dived. Why did he not receive the same ban? Because the club involved is Manchester United and the player involved is English.

This diving issue kicks up every now and again, and will continue to do so. People need to accept that it is part of the game, whether they like it or not, and it will remain part of the game until FIFA introduce a concrete and consistent method of stamping it out, consistency being the key.

Also, Chelsea's ban will get shortened or even overturned. There are reports of them obtaining a letter from UEFA prior to moving for Kakuta, giving their permission to sign the player. Also, the playing contract with Lens was signed by his mother, not the player as he was too young at the time.

Therefore, I'm confident that at the very least the ban will be shortened significantly. To say FIFA overreacted over this would be the understatement of the century. Ridiculous to consider that Chelsea could be the only club guilty of this kind of activity.

The bottom line is, Football and morality don't mix well. These days it's more to do with running a business than the love of the game.

  • by Dave on September 07, 2009 at 02:13 PM

UEFA & FIFA have as much backbone and guts as a filleted fish. Top flight football is played by nancy boys and the management would sell their grandmothers for a penalty. Video referees should be introduced like rugby, a game played by gentlemen and dis respect for the ref is punished with no recourse to the law.

Unless of course, you are talking about Harlequins. MH

  • by Stewart on September 15, 2009 at 04:30 AM

POST A COMMENT

Security code image.