Matthew Hall

Advertisement

FIFA, Corruption, and Lies

Is Australia ready to play games to host 2018 World Cup?

There's much for Football Federation Australia, the Federal government, and the country as a whole, to learn from England's failed attempt to host the 2006 World Cup.

None of it is about stadium construction, public transport, smiling volunteers, or sunny weather in the middle of winter (when a down under World Cup would be scheduled).

This week, an email landed in my inbox from Andrew Jennings, a British colleague whose investigations into the International Olympic Committee and FIFA have become the stuff of journalistic legend.

You can visit his website here.

Some people compare Jennings to a moral crusader, a shining light in a fog of facts and misinformation, and one of not many of his profession prepared to take on powerful sporting organisations to expose abuse of powers and outright corruption.

Others, and that includes FIFA president Sepp Blatter who has banned Jennings from any FIFA events, might consider him to be a delusional irritating nut case.

Jack Warner, the powerful FIFA executive committee member exposed and shamed for on-selling his country's ticket allocation for the 2006 World Cup for profit is certainly no fan.

Warner's response to questions about the issue was to spit on the journalist.

Maybe Jennings hit a sensitive spot.

Warner, whose power comes from being boss of Trinidad and Tobago's football association, was hauled before FIFA's Ethics Committee and asked to explain his ticket sell off.

SBS TV's Les Murray is a member of the committee that found Warner had been a very naughty boy. Warner was sent upstairs to face his fellow Executive Committee members to be reprimanded.

The punishment for blatantly abusing his privileged position?

FIFA's top bosses told him to be more careful with Trinidad and Tobago's ticket allocation in future.

You can read about the outcome here.

Jennings' latest email concerned some of the challenges facing England's bid for the 2018 World Cup, the same event that Australia is planning a run for.

England's football history, position in Europe, so-called Best League In The World, logistical infrastructure and economy all mean nothing, the theory went, if the bid was not politically savvy.

A recent Jennings' TV program for the BBC explained that the England bid for 2006 included sending out the all-star national team to play diplomatic friendlies against lightweights Saudi Arabia and Malta, games that perhaps added a new twist to the term "meaningless" for non-competitive matches.

It was also explained the England FA paid for Thailand's national team coach (an Englishman).

You can read about other issues the program addressed here.

None of this is illegal nor corrupt but shows the tips and favours a bidding nation - like Australia - may have to participate in.

Of course, England didn't win the rights to host 2006. It didn't even make the final round.

With a little help from Charlie Dempsey, formerly the Oceania Football Confederation's comedic boss, South Africa was pipped by Germany.

(For those who have forgotten or never knew, here's a reminder of why Australia wanted out of Oceania for so long.)

Jennings' BBC program also reveals that part of Germany's bid-winning strategy was for its government to set up business and arms - as in military weapons - deals with Saudi Arabia, Thailand, and South Korea.

In other words, thanks for the soccer coach but we'll take a few bombs instead, anytime.

These are the sort of games Australia - not just Frank Lowy and the FFA - will have to put on the shin pads for if we're serious about 2018.

Last week's column about the potential 2018 bid met with many responses about daring to dream and if we don't try we will never get any where, etc, etc.

These were all admirable sentiments.

When John O'Neill began his stint as boss of the FFA he came with a top pedigree in Australian sport. He'd run the Australian Rugby Union and overseen a rugby union World Cup hosted by Australia.

But he told me on his return from his first FIFA meeting that he'd seen nothing like it.

He wasn't just talking about the buffet spread.

(Having attended some FIFA knees-ups, I can vouch for the abundant buffet).

O'Neill's admission, coming from one of the country's most experienced administrators, was revealing.

Australia's current influence within FIFA is relatively lightweight.

We have four positions on committees; one filled by Les Murray here.

You can see Frank Lowy's position here.

FFA CEO Ben Buckley's here.

And former Player's Union boss John Didulica here.

We're going to have start shaking a lot of hands at FIFA parties over the next few years.

The question is, do we want to get involved in the political machinations to successfully bid for 2018?

And, just as importantly, do we even care about allegations of corruption, power, and lies?

COMMENTS

I think that when bidding for the World Cup it is important to remember that if you swim with sharks then be prepared to get bitten. The corruption within FIFA is now so blatently open that anyone bidding may as well just say openly that they will match any bribe, kickback and inducement. Bids never had anything to do with stadia, tradition or leaving legacies. To rely on a so-called Ethics Comittee led by Seb Coe (who also by sheer coincidence is doing very well financially out of the successful London 2012 bid) to clean up the organisation is like expecting the Klu Klux Klan to investigate how they can recruit more black members. It just ain't going to happen.

  • by tony bougatsas on November 11, 2007 at 05:37 AM

the mere fact that FIFA ended its supposed rotation policy to allow England to bid, & the second point that Mexico & the USA are now interested despite their being the last two nations who could mount a decent argument that they deseve another go so soon, shows what a waste of time it will be for us to enter this nest of vipers. Australia should support a bid from China, which makes more sense for world football economically & more importantly would give us a second cup in television prime-time.

  • by ashton on November 11, 2007 at 08:21 AM

No !!!!!!!!!

Remember how AUS & Oceania have been shafted by FIFA over the past 50 years?

Let the pommies stump up the cash for FIFA.

AUS should spend ANY money we have in developing OUR game, teams & facilities for OUR pleasure, not FIFA's.

Doing anything else will only encourage the Old Septic Bladder and his band of shonky cronies.

  • by Andy on November 11, 2007 at 08:54 AM

mathew, you are naive to suggest that Australia is not corrupt enough to jump into the dirty game of bidding for world cup? how exactly did we land the sydney olympics?

  • by han on November 11, 2007 at 09:49 AM

No, we should not be involved.

As FIFA and the International Olympic Committee are so corrupt, why are we involved at all?

Bad people turn good things (e.g. medicine, religion, sports) to bad. Get rid of the bastards or don't cooperate with them. To participate while they are have any power or influence whatsoever just perpetuates it.

I boycott all Olympics because the organisation is so corrupt.

  • by andrew on November 11, 2007 at 09:50 AM

Why is it that when it comes to football, things are always so negative. I didn't hear a single thing about corruption, power, lies etc when we made a bid for the 2000 Olympics.

Look at how much publicity the Sydney v Melbourne game got for crowd behaviour compared to cricket matches. Ever been to a cricket match Matt? I can tell you the crowd behaviour is shocking but we never hear anything in the paper about it.

As for FIFA, is anyone better than Frank Lowy when it comes to power and politics?

  • by Michael on November 11, 2007 at 03:16 PM

Hi Matthew,
Firstly, i always look forward to hearing what the parrot has to say every Sunday.
I have a question for you:
Despite AC Milan being the current European Champions, despite them having the best Footballer in the world in Kaka & the all-time leading World Cup Goal scorer in Ronaldo, despite AC Milan having won the most International titles with 17, despite AC Milan are now rated the number one team in Europe in line with the UEFA co-efficent ranking system & despite AC Milan striker Fillipo Inzaghi last week equalling Gerd Muller's record of most goals scored in European Football with 62, why does the Sun Herald continue to omit this popular club from the printed edition ?

Ask and ye shall receive. MH

  • by Lupco Klimovski on November 11, 2007 at 08:28 PM

Corruption is one of the root causes of misery in the world. It is disgusting to pander to it, let alone for a football match.

  • by Danc on November 11, 2007 at 08:57 PM

It is an unfortunate part of human nature that any decision made for any purpose anywhere is not made with infomation on what is best for the people, but best for the money or powers that be. It may be reducing the rights of every voting worker in the country or awarding world cups, we can only play fair and hope the referee sees through the ruse. It's just a pity the referees are all owned by the people doing the cheating...

  • by Kris on November 11, 2007 at 11:47 PM

Well Said Lupco. I think it's sad how the Sun herald mainly focus on the English Premier League. Even though Italian players are cheats and divers, the Serie-A have some of the finest talent on the planet. Inter Milan's Zlatan Ibrahimovic & AC Milan's Kaka, Gennaro Gattuso & Andrea Pirlo would rank in my top 10 players in the world at the moment, but because they play in Italy and not England we never get to read about them or see any pictures of them in action.

  • by Martin Robinson on November 14, 2007 at 12:46 PM

POST A COMMENT

Security code image.